Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jun;38(3):227-34.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv044. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

The effect of orofacial myofunctional treatment in children with anterior open bite and tongue dysfunction: a pilot study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of orofacial myofunctional treatment in children with anterior open bite and tongue dysfunction: a pilot study

Claire Van Dyck et al. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Insufficient attention is given in the literature to the early treatment of anterior open bite (AOB) subjects receiving orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT), which aims to harmonize the orofacial functions. This prospective pilot study investigates the effects of OMT on tongue behaviour in children with AOB and a visceral swallowing pattern.

Materials and methods: The study comprised of 22 children (11 boys, 11 girls; age range: 7.1-10.6 years). They were randomly assigned into OMT and non-OMT subjects. The randomization was stratified on the presence of a transversal crossbite. At baseline (T0), at the end of treatment (T1) and at 6 months after T1 (T2) maximum tongue elevation strength was measured with the IOPI system (IOPI MEDICAL LLC, Redmond, Washington, USA). Functional characteristics such as tongue posture at rest, swallowing pattern and articulation and the presence of an AOB were observed.

Results: OMT did significantly change tongue elevation strength, tongue posture at rest, and tongue position during swallowing of solid food. At T2 more OMT subjects had contact between the lower central incisors and their antagonists or palate (P = 0.036). More OMT subjects performed a physiological pattern of water swallowing than non-OMT children at T1 and T2, although the differences were not significant. Articulation of /s,l,n,d,t/ was not improved by OMT. No interaction between OMT and expansion was found for any of the parameters.

Conclusion: OMT can positively influence tongue behaviour. However, further research is recommended to clarify the success of OMT as an adjunct to orthodontic treatment and to identify possible factors influencing the outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of patient allocation.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stahl F. and Grabowski R (2003) Orthodontic findings in the deciduous and early mixed dentition—inferences for a preventive strategy. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 64, 401–416. - PubMed
    1. Proffit W.R. (1978) Equilibrium theory revisited: factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthodontist, 48, 175–186. - PubMed
    1. Proffit W.R. Chastain B.B. and Norton L.A (1969) Linguopalatal pressure in children. American Journal of Orthodontics, 55, 154–166. - PubMed
    1. Proffit W.R. McGlone R.E. and Barrett M.J (1975) Lip and tongue pressures related to dental arch and oral cavity size in Australian aborigines. Journal of Dental Research, 54, 1161–1172. - PubMed
    1. Ichida T. Takiguchi R. and Yamada K (1999) Relationship between the lingual–palatal contact duration associated with swallowing and maxillofacial morphology with the use of electropalatography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 116, 146–151. - PubMed

Publication types