Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug;109(8):503-13.
doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv050. Epub 2015 Jul 4.

The global distribution of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever

Affiliations
Review

The global distribution of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever

Jane P Messina et al. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne infection caused by a virus (CCHFV) from the Bunyaviridae family. Domestic and wild vertebrates are asymptomatic reservoirs for the virus, putting animal handlers, slaughter-house workers and agricultural labourers at highest risk in endemic areas, with secondary transmission possible through contact with infected blood and other bodily fluids. Human infection is characterized by severe symptoms that often result in death. While it is known that CCHFV transmission is limited to Africa, Asia and Europe, definitive global extents and risk patterns within these limits have not been well described.

Methods: We used an exhaustive database of human CCHF occurrence records and a niche modeling framework to map the global distribution of risk for human CCHF occurrence.

Results: A greater proportion of shrub or grass land cover was the most important contributor to our model, which predicts highest levels of risk around the Black Sea, Turkey, and some parts of central Asia. Sub-Saharan Africa shows more focalized areas of risk throughout the Sahel and the Cape region.

Conclusions: These new risk maps provide a valuable starting point for understanding the zoonotic niche of CCHF, its extent and the risk it poses to humans.

Keywords: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever; Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus; Ecological niche modeling; Infectious diseases; Tick-borne diseases; Vector-borne diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Transmission cycle of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) where te, tl, and tn represent the eggs, larvae, and nymphs of competent tick vectors, respectively. Nymphs (tn) transmit CCHFV to small mammals and birds (a), whereas transmission to ruminants and other large animals (A) is by adult ticks (T). Primary human infections (H1) occur as a result of being directly bitten by adult ticks or squashing ticks between the fingers (T), or through contact with the blood of infected animals, usually livestock (A). The comparatively rarer human-to-human transmission (represented by the dashed line from H1 to H2) is typically between infected individuals and healthcare workers or close relatives having exposed to their infectious blood and/or bodily fluids.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Maps of A: definitive extents as determined by evidence consensus; B: recorded occurrence and generated background points used in the BRT procedure; and C: probability of occurrence of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF). A: shows the consensus on CCHF presence globally, ranging from dark green (complete consensus on absence) to purple (complete consensus on presence). Countries in yellow are those where evidence was inconclusive or contradictory for CCHF presence. B: shows the probability of CCHF occurrence in humans. Areas in purple are those most suitable for transmission, with areas in green least suitable.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The probability of occurrence of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) in the Balkans region. Areas in purple are those most suitable for transmission, with areas in green least suitable.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Probability of occurrence of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in Africa. Areas in purple are those most suitable for transmission, with areas in green least suitable.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Areas in need of surveillance for Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF). Red colouring shows areas where our models have predicted high risk for CCHF (≥0.5), but which lie within countries having low evidence consensus (between −25 and +25) on disease presence or absence. The red areas thus signify places most in need of CCHF surveillance.

Comment in

  • Emergence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.
    Leblebicioglu H, Ozaras R, Erciyas-Yavuz K. Leblebicioglu H, et al. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Nov;109(11):676-8. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv083. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015. PMID: 26464230

References

    1. Hoogstraal H. The epidemiology of tick-borne Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Asia, Europe, and Africa. J Med Entomol 1979;15:307–417. - PubMed
    1. Whitehouse CA. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Antiviral Res 2004;64:145–60. - PubMed
    1. Han N, Rayner S. Epidemiology and mutational analysis of global strains of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus. Virol Sin 2011;26:229–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ergonul O. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:203–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Papa A, Bino S, Llagami A et al. . Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Albania, 2001. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:603–6. - PubMed

Publication types