Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun 20;6(17):14744-53.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4539.

Genetic heterogeneity in cholangiocarcinoma: a major challenge for targeted therapies

Affiliations
Review

Genetic heterogeneity in cholangiocarcinoma: a major challenge for targeted therapies

Giovanni Brandi et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) encompasses a group of related but distinct malignancies whose lack of a stereotyped genetic signature makes challenging the identification of genomic landscape and the development of effective targeted therapies. Accumulated evidences strongly suggest that the remarkable genetic heterogeneity of CC may be the result of a complex interplay among different causative factors, some shared by most human cancers while others typical of this malignancy. Currently, considerable efforts are ongoing worldwide for the genetic characterization of CC, also using advanced technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Undoubtedly this technology could offer an unique opportunity to broaden our understanding on CC molecular pathogenesis. Despite this great potential, however, the high complexity in terms of factors potentially contributing to genetic variability in CC calls for a more cautionary application of NGS to this malignancy, in order to avoid possible biases and criticisms in the identification of candidate actionable targets. This approach is further justified by the urgent need to develop effective targeted therapies in this disease. A multidisciplinary approach integrating genomic, functional and clinical studies is therefore mandatory to translate the results obtained by NGS into effective targeted therapies for this orphan disease.

Keywords: cholangiocarcinoma; genetic heterogenity; targeted therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All the authors declare no competing financial interests.

None of the contents of this manuscript has been previously published or is under consideration elsewhere. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript prior to submission.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the main potential factors driving genetic heterogeneity in CC
Genetic variability in CC could be the result of a complex interplay among several factors including: a. the existence of two genetically distinct stem cell niches along the biliary tree (the canals of Hering with hepatic stem cells and the peribiliary glands with biliary tree stem/progenitor cells), with a different susceptibly to risk factors; b. tumor clonal heterogeneity. Genetically distinct tumor cell sub-clones can coexist with founder cells harboring most of the tumor-borne genetic mutations, either in the primary tumor (intratumoral heterogeneity), or in the same metastasis (intrametastatic heterogeneity). Genetic variability can also occur among metastases derived from the same primary tumor, as the different sub-clones of the primary tumor can give rise to genetically distinct lesions at the metastatic site (intermetastatic heterogeneity); c. stochastic mutations and genomic instability. The large number of cell divisions required for cancer growth makes tumor cells prone to accumulate genomic alterations with a high frequency, due to random mutations occurring during DNA replication and deficiencies in the mechanisms involved in DNA repair; d) tumor microenvironment and cancer treatment. The tumor microenvironment and cancer therapy can induce fluctuations in tumor sub-clonal architecture and genetic profile by promoting the selective growth of sub-clones with a survival advantage within a given tumor microenvironment or a given therapeutic setting and by eradicating those with a less favorable survival advantage.

References

    1. Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2014;383:2168–2179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ercolani G, Vetrone G, Grazi GL, Aramaki O, Cescon M, Ravaioli M, Serra C, Brandi G, Pinna AD. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: primary liver resection and aggressive multimodal treatment of recurrence significantly prolong survival. Ann Surg. 2010;252:107–114. - PubMed
    1. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J. ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–1281. - PubMed
    1. Fornaro L, Cereda S, Aprile G, Di Girolamo S, Santini D, Silvestris N, Lonardi S, Leone F, Milella M, Vivaldi C, Belli C, Bergamo F, Lutrino SE, et al. Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:2165–2169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bengala C, Bertolini F, Malavasi N, Boni C, Aitini E, Dealis C, Zironi S, Depenni R, Fontana A, Del Giovane C, Luppi G, Conte P. Sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:68–72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances