Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131770.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131770. eCollection 2015.

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis

Monali S Malvankar-Mehta et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) have attracted significant attention, as they have been reported to lower intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and have an excellent safety profile. The iStent is an example of a minimally invasive glaucoma device that has received particular attention due to its early and wide spread utilization. There is a growing body of evidence supporting its use at the time of phacoemulsification to help lower IOP. However, it is still not clear how much of the IOP lowering effect can be attributed to the iStent, the crystalline lens extraction or both when inserted concurrently at the time of phacoemulsification. This has been an important issue in understanding its potential role in the glaucoma management paradigm.

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the IOP lowering effect of iStent insertion at the time of phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone for patients with glaucoma and cataracts.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted utilizing various databases. Studies examining the IOP lowering effect of iStent insertion in combination with phacoemulsification, as well as studies examining the IOP lowering effect of phacoemulsification alone were included. Thirty-seven studies, reporting on 2495 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The percentage reduction in IOP (IOPR%) and mean reduction in topical glaucoma medications after surgery were determined. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was computed as a measure of the treatment effect for continuous outcomes taking into account heterogeneity. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were applied.

Results: A 4% IOP reduction (IOPR%) from baseline occurred following phacoemulsification as a solo procedure compared to 9% following an iStent implant with phacoemulsification, and 27% following 2 iStents implants with phacoemulsification. Compared with cataract extraction alone, iStent with phacoemulsification resulted in significant reduction in the post-operative IOP (IOPR%) (SMD = -0.46, 95% CI: [-0.87, -0.06]). A weighted mean reduction in the number of glaucoma medications per patient was 1.01 following phacoemulsification alone compared to 1.33 after one iStent implant with phacoemulsification, and 1.1 after 2 iStent implants with phacoemulsification. Compared to cataract extraction alone, iStent with cataract extraction showed a significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: [-1.18, -0.12]). Funnel plots suggested the absence of publication bias.

Conclusion: Both iStent implantation with concurrent phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification alone result in a significant decrease in IOP and topical glaucoma medications. In terms of both reductions, iStent with phacoemulsification significantly outperforms phacoemulsification alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram for iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Funnel plot for pre- and post-operative IOPR% for studies comparing iStent insertion with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Funnel plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications for studies comparing iStent insertion with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Forest plot for difference in post-operative IOPR% for studies comparing iStent insertion with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Forest plot for difference in post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications of iStent with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification only.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications for studies examining phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications for studies examining iStent insertion with simultaneous phacoemulsification.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications by follow-up (months) for phacoemulsification only group.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications by follow-up (months) for iStent and simultaneous phacoemulsification group.

References

    1. The National Coalition for Vision Health (2010) Vision Loss in Canada 2011.
    1. Kingman S. (2004) Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally World Health Organization. 11 p. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kingman S (2004) Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally Bulletin of the World Health Organization. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British journal of ophthalmology 90: 262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevent Blindness America (2013) Cost of Vision Problems: The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Eye Disorders in the United States National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.

Substances