Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;115(11):2311-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3212-y. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise-induced pain

Affiliations

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise-induced pain

Luca Angius et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) provides a new exciting means to investigate the role of the brain during exercise. However, this technique is not widely used in exercise science, with little known regarding effective electrode montages. This study investigated whether tDCS of the motor cortex (M1) would elicit an analgesic response to exercise-induced pain (EIP).

Methods: Nine participants completed a VO2max test and three time to exhaustion (TTE) tasks on separate days following either 10 min 2 mA tDCS of the M1, a sham or a control. Additionally, seven participants completed 3 cold pressor tests (CPT) following the same experimental conditions (tDCS, SHAM, CON). Using a well-established tDCS protocol, tDCS was delivered by placing the anodal electrode above the left M1 with the cathodal electrode above dorsolateral right prefrontal cortex. Gas exchange, blood lactate, EIP and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were monitored during the TTE test. Perceived pain was recorded during the CPT.

Results: During the TTE, no significant differences in time to exhaustion, RPE or EIP were found between conditions. However, during the CPT, perceived pain was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in the tDCS condition (7.4 ± 1.2) compared with both the CON (8.6 ± 1.0) and SHAM (8.4 ± 1.3) conditions.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that stimulation of the M1 using tDCS does not induce analgesia during exercise, suggesting that the processing of pain produced via classic measures of experimental pain (i.e., a CPT) is different to that of EIP. These results provide important methodological advancement in developing the use of tDCS in exercise.

Keywords: Exercise; Fatigue; Pain perception; Performance; tDCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):259-73 - PubMed
    1. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):797-806 - PubMed
    1. Front Physiol. 2013 May 13;4:104 - PubMed
    1. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;49(18):1213-8 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 2009 Jan 15;587(1):271-83 - PubMed