Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct;12(10):588-96.
doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.105. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

Cardiovascular biomarkers and sex: the case for women

Affiliations
Review

Cardiovascular biomarkers and sex: the case for women

Lori B Daniels et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Measurement of biomarkers is a critical component of cardiovascular care. Women and men differ in their cardiac physiology and manifestations of cardiovascular disease. Although most cardiovascular biomarkers are used by clinicians without taking sex into account, sex-specific differences in biomarkers clearly exist. Baseline concentrations of many biomarkers (including cardiac troponin, natriuretic peptides, galectin-3, and soluble ST2) differ in men versus women, but these sex-specific differences do not generally translate into a need for differential sex-based cut-off points. Furthermore, most biomarkers are similarly diagnostic and prognostic, regardless of sex. Two potential exceptions are cardiac troponins measured by high-sensitivity assay, and proneurotensin. Troponin levels are lower in women than in men and, with the use of high-sensitivity assays, sex-specific cut-off points might improve the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Proneurotensin is a novel biomarker that was found to be predictive of incident cardiovascular disease in women, but not men, and was also predictive of incident breast cancer. If confirmed, proneurotensin might be a unique biomarker of disease risk in women. With any biomarker, an understanding of sex-specific differences might improve its use and might also lead to an enhanced understanding of the physiological differences between the hearts of men and women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;15(2):151-8 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2012 Oct 10;308(14):1469-75 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):e584-636 - PubMed
    1. J Intern Med. 2012 Jul;272(1):55-64 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Nov;101(5):447-53 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources