Influence of glycemic control on gain in VO2 peak, in patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome. The prospective DARE study
- PMID: 26152221
- PMCID: PMC4495681
- DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0055-8
Influence of glycemic control on gain in VO2 peak, in patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome. The prospective DARE study
Abstract
Background: Gain in VO2 peak after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is associated with reduced mortality and morbidity. We have previously shown in CR, that gain in VO2 peak is reduced in Type 2 diabetic patients and that response to CR is impaired by hyperglycemia.
Methods: We set up a prospective multicenter study (DARE) whose primary objective was to determine whether good glycemic control during CR may improve the gain in VO2 peak. Sixty four type 2 diabetic patients, referred to CR after a recent ACS, were randomized to insulin intensive therapy or a control group with continuation of the pre-CR antidiabetic treatment. The primary objective was to study the effect of glycemic control during CR on the improvement of peak VO2 by comparing first the 2 treatment groups (insulin intensive vs. control) and second, 2 pre-specified glycemic control groups according to the final fructosamine level (below and above the median).
Results: At the end of the CR program, the gain in VO2 peak and the final fructosamine level (assessing glycemic level during CR) were not different between the 2 treatment groups. However, patients who had final fructosamine level below the median value, assessing good glycemic control during CR, showed significantly higher gain in VO2 peak (3.5 ± 2.4 vs. 1.7 ± 2.4 ml/kg/min,p = 0.014) and ventilatory threshold (2.7 ± 2.5 vs. 1.2 ± 1.9 ml/kg/min,p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of good CR-responders (relative gain in VO2 peak ≥ 16 %): 66 % vs. 36 %, p = 0.011. In multivariate analysis, gain in VO2 peak was associated with final fructosamine level (p = 0.010) but not with age, gender, duration of diabetes, type of ACS, insulin treatment or basal fructosamine.
Conclusions: The DARE study shows that, in type 2 diabetes, good glycemic control during CR is an independent factor associated with gain in VO2 peak. This emphasizes the need for good glycemic control in CR for type 2 diabetic patients.
Trial registration: Trial registered as NCT00354237 (19 July 2006).
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comparison of twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 and once-daily insulin glargine in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral therapy: a randomized, open-label study.Endocr Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):41-50. doi: 10.4158/EP10079.OR. Endocr Pract. 2011. PMID: 20713345 Clinical Trial.
-
Glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome: liraglutide compared with insulin glargine: a pilot study.J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520926063. doi: 10.1177/0300060520926063. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32567433 Free PMC article.
-
Mealtime 50/50 basal + prandial insulin analogue mixture with a basal insulin analogue, both plus metformin, in the achievement of target HbA1c and pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multinational, 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison.Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2349-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.016. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18158076 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes.Clin Ther. 2005;27 Suppl B:S57-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.021. Clin Ther. 2005. PMID: 16519038 Review.
-
Gender difference in long-term effect of cardiac rehabilitation; data from CRAGE-extra study.Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Apr 30;21:200273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200273. eCollection 2024 Jun. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024. PMID: 39118983 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Potential Effects on Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Status After a Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training Program in Diabetes Patients - a Randomized Controlled Trial.Sports Med Open. 2016 Aug 11;2:31. doi: 10.1186/s40798-016-0052-1. eCollection 2015 Jun. Sports Med Open. 2016. PMID: 27563535 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Glycemic Control on Endothelial and Cardiac Dysfunction Induced by Red Blood Cells in Type 2 Diabetes.Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 2;10:861. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00861. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31427970 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes after cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients with and without diabetes mellitus: The EU-CaRE multicenter cohort study.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Mar 19;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01013-8. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020. PMID: 32192524 Free PMC article.
-
Management of hyperglycemia during and in the immediate follow-up of acute coronary syndrome.J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr;30(2):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 1. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29910582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Impact of Hypoglycemic Therapy on the Prognosis for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.J Pers Med. 2022 May 22;12(5):845. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050845. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35629267 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Oldridge NB, Guyatt GH, Fischer ME, Rimm AA. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials JAMA. 1988;260(7):945–50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical