Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov;108(11):440-50.
doi: 10.1177/0141076815593403. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review

Philippe Autier et al. J R Soc Med. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: We compared calculations of relative risks of cancer death in Swedish mammography trials and in other cancer screening trials.

Participants: Men and women from 30 to 74 years of age.

Setting: Randomised trials on cancer screening.

Design: For each trial, we identified the intervention period, when screening was offered to screening groups and not to control groups, and the post-intervention period, when screening (or absence of screening) was the same in screening and control groups. We then examined which cancer deaths had been used for the computation of relative risk of cancer death.

Main outcome measures: Relative risk of cancer death.

Results: In 17 non-breast screening trials, deaths due to cancers diagnosed during the intervention and post-intervention periods were used for relative risk calculations. In the five Swedish trials, relative risk calculations used deaths due to breast cancers found during intervention periods, but deaths due to breast cancer found at first screening of control groups were added to these groups. After reallocation of the added breast cancer deaths to post-intervention periods of control groups, relative risks of 0.86 (0.76; 0.97) were obtained for cancers found during intervention periods and 0.83 (0.71; 0.97) for cancers found during post-intervention periods, indicating constant reduction in the risk of breast cancer death during follow-up, irrespective of screening.

Conclusions: The use of unconventional statistical methods in Swedish trials has led to overestimation of risk reduction in breast cancer death attributable to mammography screening. The constant risk reduction observed in screening groups was probably due to the trial design that optimised awareness and medical management of women allocated to screening groups.

Keywords: breast cancer; randomised trials; screening; statistical analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Design of randomised trials for the evaluation of cancer screening methods (R: screening round). Intervention periods are the continuous lines and the post-intervention periods are the dashed lines. (a) Typical design, (b) design specific to Swedish trials on breast cancer screening.

Comment in

References

    1. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359: 909–919. - PubMed
    1. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 793–806, v. - PubMed
    1. Autier P, Boniol M, Middleton R, Dore JF, Hery C, Zheng T, et al. Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1726–1735. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Glas NA, de Craen AJ, Bastiaannet E, Op ‘t Land EG, Kiderlen M, van de Water W, et al. Effect of implementation of the mass breast cancer screening programme in older women in the Netherlands: population based study. BMJ 2014; 349: g5410–g5410. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1998–2005. - PubMed

Publication types