Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review
- PMID: 26152677
- PMCID: PMC4672251
- DOI: 10.1177/0141076815593403
Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: We compared calculations of relative risks of cancer death in Swedish mammography trials and in other cancer screening trials.
Participants: Men and women from 30 to 74 years of age.
Setting: Randomised trials on cancer screening.
Design: For each trial, we identified the intervention period, when screening was offered to screening groups and not to control groups, and the post-intervention period, when screening (or absence of screening) was the same in screening and control groups. We then examined which cancer deaths had been used for the computation of relative risk of cancer death.
Main outcome measures: Relative risk of cancer death.
Results: In 17 non-breast screening trials, deaths due to cancers diagnosed during the intervention and post-intervention periods were used for relative risk calculations. In the five Swedish trials, relative risk calculations used deaths due to breast cancers found during intervention periods, but deaths due to breast cancer found at first screening of control groups were added to these groups. After reallocation of the added breast cancer deaths to post-intervention periods of control groups, relative risks of 0.86 (0.76; 0.97) were obtained for cancers found during intervention periods and 0.83 (0.71; 0.97) for cancers found during post-intervention periods, indicating constant reduction in the risk of breast cancer death during follow-up, irrespective of screening.
Conclusions: The use of unconventional statistical methods in Swedish trials has led to overestimation of risk reduction in breast cancer death attributable to mammography screening. The constant risk reduction observed in screening groups was probably due to the trial design that optimised awareness and medical management of women allocated to screening groups.
Keywords: breast cancer; randomised trials; screening; statistical analyses.
© The Royal Society of Medicine.
Figures
Comment in
-
The Swedish randomised controlled trial on mammography screening has been properly designed, conducted and analysed.J R Soc Med. 2015 Nov;108(11):429-30. doi: 10.1177/0141076815616090. J R Soc Med. 2015. PMID: 26609096 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Systematic review of the breast cancer screening trials is error-ridden.J R Soc Med. 2015 Nov;108(11):430-1. doi: 10.1177/0141076815620070. J R Soc Med. 2015. PMID: 26609097 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Screening mammography: Authors' response to Nyström and Tabar and colleagues.J R Soc Med. 2015 Nov;108(11):431-2. doi: 10.1177/0141076815616314. J R Soc Med. 2015. PMID: 26609098 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359: 909–919. - PubMed
-
- Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 793–806, v. - PubMed
-
- Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1998–2005. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical