Now that we're here, where are we? The JBI approach to evidence-based healthcare 20 years on
- PMID: 26154180
- DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000053
Now that we're here, where are we? The JBI approach to evidence-based healthcare 20 years on
Abstract
Approaching almost 20 years of activity (and 10 years this year since the Joanna Briggs Institute, JBI, model of evidence-based healthcare was first published), the JBI remains one of the most successful international organizations to focus on the synthesis, transfer, and implementation of research evidence. Although similar in age and focus to the Cochrane Collaboration and other organizations of this nature, JBI has, from its inception, taken a broader view on what constitutes evidence to inform clinical decision making at the point of care and the need to be inclusive in order to answer the many different types of clinical and other care questions needing answers. The Institute published the JBI model of evidence-based healthcare 10 years ago this year, outlining a developmental framework of evidence-based practice that attempted to situate healthcare evidence and its role and use within the complexity of practice settings globally. Guidance on how to conduct reviews of different evidence types was limited at that time and has come a long way in the last decade. With a focus on both the scientific and pragmatic elements of the translational cycle, this article explores the history of methodological development of the Institute and postures where to from here.
Similar articles
-
Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):170-8. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26288063
-
Redeveloping the JBI Model of Evidence Based Healthcare.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Dec;16(4):227-241. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000139. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018. PMID: 29664758
-
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008. PMID: 21631815
-
A re-consideration of what constitutes "evidence" in the healthcare professions.Nurs Sci Q. 2007 Jan;20(1):85-8. doi: 10.1177/0894318406296306. Nurs Sci Q. 2007. PMID: 17202521 Review.
-
JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Apr 14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35429608
Cited by
-
International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains of 60 Physical Functioning Measurement Instruments Used During the Adult Intensive Care Unit Stay: A Scoping Review.Phys Ther. 2019 May 1;99(5):627-640. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy158. Phys Ther. 2019. PMID: 30590839 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 30453902 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function and functional capacity in patients with early stroke: a meta-analysis.Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024 Feb 22;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00338-7. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024. PMID: 38383309 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What are the effects of teaching Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) at different levels of health professions education? An updated overview of systematic reviews.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254191. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34292986 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources