Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):458-65.
doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0381.2576. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

Effectiveness of papain gel in venous ulcer treatment: randomized clinical trial

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of papain gel in venous ulcer treatment: randomized clinical trial

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Ana Luiza Soares Rodrigues et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: to assess the effectiveness of 2% papain gel compared to 2% carboxymethyl cellulose in the treatment of chronic venous ulcer patients.

Method: randomized controlled clinical trial with 12-week follow-up. The sample consisted of 18 volunteers and 28 venous ulcers. In the trial group, 2% papain gel was used and, in the control group, 2% carboxymethyl cellulose gel.

Results: the trial group showed a significant reduction in the lesion area, especially between the fifth and twelfth week of treatment, with two healed ulcers and a considerable increase in the amount of epithelial tissue in the wound bed.

Conclusion: 2% papain gel demonstrated greater effectiveness in the reduction of the lesion area, but was similar to 2% carboxymethyl cellulose gel regarding the reduction in the amount of exudate and devitalized tissue. Multicenter research is suggested to evidence the effectiveness of 2% papain gel in the healing of venous ulcers. UTN number: U1111-1157-2998.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Evolution of venous ulcer area according to treatment group. Niterói, RJ, Brazil, 2014

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Purwins S, Herberger K, Debus ES, Rustenbach SJ, Pelzer P, Rabe E. Cost-of-illness of chronic leg ulcers in Germany. Int Wound J. 2010;7(2):97–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):763–771. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lopes CR, Figueiredo M, Ávila AM, Soares LMBM, Dionisio VC. Avaliação das limitações de úlcera venosa em membros inferiores. J Vasc Bras. 2013;12(1):5–9.
    1. van Gent WB, Wilschut ED, Wittens C. Management of venous ulcer disease. BMJ. 2010;341:c6045–c6045. - PubMed
    1. Raju S, Neglén P. Chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2319–2327. - PubMed

Publication types