Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):450-7.
doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0377.2575. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

Construction and validation of indicators and respective definitions for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Affiliations

Construction and validation of indicators and respective definitions for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: to develop indicators for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status and the respective conceptual and operational definitions validated by experts and in a clinical setting among patients after having experienced a stroke.

Method: methodological study with concept analysis and content and clinical validations. The Content Validation Index was verified for the scores assigned by 11 experts to indicators. Two pairs of nurses assessed 81 patients during the clinical validation: one pair used an instrument with definitions and the other used an instrument without definitions. The resulting assessments were compared using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Friedman's test, and Minimal Important Difference calculation.

Results: All the indicators, with the exception of the indicator Ability to bring food to mouth, presented Content Validation Index above 0.80. The pair using the instrument with definitions presented an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient above 0.80 for all the indicators and similarity was found in all the assessments, according to the Minimal Important Difference calculation. The pair using the instrument without definitions presented a low coefficient (ρ<0.75) for all the indicators.

Conclusion: the results showed that greater uniformity and accuracy was achieved by the pair of nurses using the conceptual and operational definitions for the indicators of the nursing outcome Swallowing Status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Summary of results of Concept Analysis for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status for patients after stroke.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smithard DG, Smeeton NC, Wolfe CD. Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter? Age Ageing. 2007;36:90–94. - PubMed
    1. Paixão CT, Silva LD, Camerini FG. Perfil da disfagia após um acidente vascular cerebral: uma revisão integrativa. Rev Rene. 2010;11(1):181–190.
    1. Moorhead S, Johnson MD, Mass M, Swanson E. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). Measurement of Health Outcomes. 5th.ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2013. 776
    1. Moorhead S, Johnson MD, Mass M, Swanson E. Classificação dos Resultados de Enfermagem. 4ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2010. pp. 464–465.
    1. Vitor AF, Araujo TL. Definições para o resultado de enfermagem comportamento de prevenção de quedas: uma revisão integrativa. [10 set 2013];Rev Eletr Enferm. 2011 13(2):313–322. a Available from: http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v13/n2/v13n2a18.htm.

Publication types