Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;39(3):271-8.
doi: 10.5114/ceji.2014.45936. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Cytokine signatures of human whole blood for monitoring immunosuppression

Affiliations

Cytokine signatures of human whole blood for monitoring immunosuppression

Yi He et al. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2014.

Abstract

How to evaluate status of the immune system is extremely critical for clinical immunosuppressive treatment. In this study, we tested the secretion of cytokines in undiluted whole blood samples stimulated with Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin (IONO), and compared the effects of dexamethasone (DEX), cyclosporine A (CsA) or mycophenolic acid (MPA), either alone or in combination, on cytokine profiles. The results showed that both DEX and CsA dose-dependently inhibited the production of eleven cytokines: interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-13, IL-17, interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Unexpectedly, MPA showed no obvious influences except for the mild inhibition on GM-CSF production. In combination treatment, cytokine profiles reflect not only the synergistic effects among drugs, but also the specific effect of the individual drug. Thus, the effects of different immunosuppressants could be reflected through their specific cytokine signatures, which can be applied to maximize immunosuppressive effects, while to minimize risk of infections and help physicians to reasonably apply immunosuppressants.

Keywords: autoimmune immune diseases; cytokine; immune status; immunosuppression; infection; rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
DEX dose-dependently inhibits cytokine secretion. Whole blood (200 µl) was treated with DEX (0.1, 1 and 10 µg/ml) for 6 h followed by stimulation with PMA (0.15 µg/ml) + IONO (2.5 µg/ml) for another 6 h. Supernatants were collected for cytokine detection using the Bio-Plex system. Values are presented as Mean ± SD (n = 3) (linear trend test *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CsA dose-dependently inhibits cytokine secretion. Whole blood (200 µl) was treated with CsA (0.05, 0.25 and 1.25 µg/ml) for 6 h followed by stimulation with PMA (0.15 µg/ml) + IONO (2.5 µg/ml) for another 6 h. Supernatants were collected for cytokine detection using the Bio-Plex system. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) (linear trend test **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MPA dose-dependently inhibits cytokine secretion. Whole blood (200 µl) was treated with MPA (1, 10 and 30 µg/ml) for 6 h followed by stimulation with PMA (0.15 µg/ml) + IONO (2.5 µg/ml) for another 6 h. Supernatants were collected for cytokine detection using the Bio-Plex system. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) (linear trend test *p < 0.05)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cytokine profiles reflect the synergistic and specific effects of immunosuppressants. Whole blood was treated with either DEX (1 µg/ml), CsA (0.25 µg/ml), MPA (10 µg/ml) alone or a combination of three drugs for 6 h followed by stimulation with PMA (0.15 µg/ml) + IONO (2.5 µg/ml) for another 6 h. The results show that cytokine profiles can reflect the synergistic effects among immunosuppressants and distinctive effect of individual drug (b, c, d, m: the indicated groups were compared with a group of blank control, or single treatment groups with CsA, DEX or MPA, respectively). Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, One-way ANOVA analysis *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashton-Chess J, Giral M, Soulillou JP, Brouard S. Can immune monitoring help to minimize immunosuppression in kidney transplantation? Transpl Int. 2009;22:110–119. - PubMed
    1. Chapman J. Addressing the challenges for improving long-term outcomes in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2008;40(10 Suppl):S2–4. - PubMed
    1. Weimar W, Rischen-Vos J, de Kuiper P, et al. Tapering immunosuppression in recipients of living donor kidney transplants. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(Suppl 4):iv61–63. - PubMed
    1. Kim DH, Kim JG, Sohn SK, et al. Clinical impact of early absolute lymphocyte count after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2004;125:217–224. - PubMed
    1. Draskovic-Pavlovic B, Hrvacevic R, Ignjatovic Lj, et al. Importance of determining the absolute CD3+ lymphocyte count during induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin in kidney transplantation patients. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2000;57:285–290. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources