Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul 1;4(7):373-381.
doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0557.

Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence

Affiliations
Review

Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence

Steven L Percival et al. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). .

Abstract

Significance: Microorganisms can exist both in the planktonic and biofilm state. Each phenotypic state has a role to play in delaying healing and causing infections of both acute and chronic wounds. However, the virulent biofilm state is the fundamental reason that chronic wounds do not heal in a timely manner. We hypothesize that because microorganisms attach to any surface, biofilms can be found in all chronic wounds. However, it is not the biofilm per se that represents the greatest obstacle to the healing of a chronic wound, but its virulence and pathogenicity. Recent Advances: Numerous studies with animals and humans have identified biofilms in wounds. In particular, these studies have highlighted how biofilms impede host fibroblast development, inflammatory responses, and the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy. Despite this, the role biofilms play in affecting the healing of wounds is still vigorously debated. Critical Issues: Clinicians must understand the role that pathogenic biofilms play in impairing the healing of chronic wounds and in increasing the risk for wound infection, with its potentially catastrophic outcomes. The composition of the biofilm, its physiochemical properties, the climaxed indigenous microbiota and their virulence/pathogenicity, microbial numbers and the host's pathophysiology, and immunological fitness will govern the sustainability of a pathogenic biofilm in a wound and its resistance to interventions. Future Directions: Establishing which specific pathogenic biofilms delay wound healing should help guide better wound care practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Steven L. Percival, PhD

References

    1. Percival SL, Dowd SE. The Microbiology of Wounds. In: Percival SL, Cutting K, eds. Chronic Wounds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010
    1. Burmølle M, Thomsen TR, Fazli M, et al. . Biofilms in chronic infections—a matter of opportunity–monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010;59:324. - PubMed
    1. Grant SS, Hung DT. Persistent bacterial infections, antibiotic tolerance, and the oxidative stress response. Virulence 2013;4:83 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woods E, Davis P, Barnett J, Percival SL. Wound healing, immunology and biofilms. In: Percival SL, Cutting K, eds. Microbiology of Wounds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010:271–292
    1. Percival SL, Cooper R, Lipsky B. Antimicrobial interventions for wounds. In: Percival SL, Cutting K, eds. Microbiology of Wounds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010:293–328