Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;21(6):507-12.
doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.15-00066. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

The Outcomes and Quality of Life of Patients with Achalasia after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in the Short-Term

Affiliations

The Outcomes and Quality of Life of Patients with Achalasia after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in the Short-Term

Xiao-Juan Liu et al. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the short-term efficacy and quality of life (QOL) of patients with achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Methods: Thirty-five achalasia patients underwent POEM from May 2013 to December 2013. The data on clinical evaluation and QOL before therapy, at 1 month and 6 months postoperation were collected and analyzed.

Results: All the thirty-five patients underwent POEM successfully. By comparing the data of the preoperative with that of 1 month and 6 months after POEM respectively, we found that: mean Eckardt score decreased (6.83 vs 0.51, 6.83 vs 0.46, all P <0.05), esophagus diameter reduced (47.97 mm vs 32.00 mm, 47.97 mm vs 28.50 mm, all P <0.05), and esophageal manometry declined (29.5 mmHg vs 11.5 mmHg, 29.5 mmHg vs 10.3 mmHg, all P <0.05). Complications occurred in 14.3% (5/35) of the cases, and no recurrence was observed. At each time point, postoperative QOL scores were higher than those of preoperative (P <0.05).

Conclusions: POEM is safe and effective for treating achalasia in the short-term, it can relieve clinic symptoms as well as improve patients' QOL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The scores are performed as mean scores given in Table 3. *P <0.05 QOL scores of the preoperative vs those of the postoperative. #P <0.05 QOL scores of 1 month postoperatively vs those of 6 months postoperatively. QOL: quality of life

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eckardt AJ, Eckardt VF. Treatment and surveillance strategies in achalasia: an update. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 311-9. - PubMed
    1. Chuah SK, Hsu PI, Wu KL, et al. 2011 update on esophageal achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 1573-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chuah SK, Hu TH, Wu KL, et al. Clinical remission in endoscope-guided pneumatic dilation for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: 7-year follow-up results of a prospective investigation. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 862-7. - PubMed
    1. Gockel I, Junginger T, Eckardt VF. Long-term results of conventional myotomy in patients with achalasia: a prospective 20-year analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 1400-8. - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Bessell JR, Chew A, et al. Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy for achalasia: clinical outcomes beyond 5 years. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 594-600. - PubMed