Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
- PMID: 26157077
- PMCID: PMC4496786
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3480
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic and triage accuracy of online symptom checkers (tools that use computer algorithms to help patients with self diagnosis or self triage).
Design: Audit study.
Setting: Publicly available, free symptom checkers.
Participants: 23 symptom checkers that were in English and provided advice across a range of conditions. 45 standardized patient vignettes were compiled and equally divided into three categories of triage urgency: emergent care required (for example, pulmonary embolism), non-emergent care reasonable (for example, otitis media), and self care reasonable (for example, viral upper respiratory tract infection).
Main outcome measures: For symptom checkers that provided a diagnosis, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker listed the correct diagnosis first or within the first 20 potential diagnoses (n=770 standardized patient evaluations). For symptom checkers that provided a triage recommendation, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker correctly recommended emergent care, non-emergent care, or self care (n=532 standardized patient evaluations).
Results: The 23 symptom checkers provided the correct diagnosis first in 34% (95% confidence interval 31% to 37%) of standardized patient evaluations, listed the correct diagnosis within the top 20 diagnoses given in 58% (55% to 62%) of standardized patient evaluations, and provided the appropriate triage advice in 57% (52% to 61%) of standardized patient evaluations. Triage performance varied by urgency of condition, with appropriate triage advice provided in 80% (95% confidence interval 75% to 86%) of emergent cases, 55% (47% to 63%) of non-emergent cases, and 33% (26% to 40%) of self care cases (P<0.001). Performance on appropriate triage advice across the 23 individual symptom checkers ranged from 33% (95% confidence interval 19% to 48%) to 78% (64% to 91%) of standardized patient evaluations.
Conclusions: Symptom checkers had deficits in both triage and diagnosis. Triage advice from symptom checkers is generally risk averse, encouraging users to seek care for conditions where self care is reasonable.
© Semigran et al 2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Comment in
-
Fifty million people use computerised self triage.BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3727. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26156750 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(11):514-519. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50600. Epub 2020 May 11. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 32391611
-
Accuracy of a Popular Online Symptom Checker for Ophthalmic Diagnoses.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 1;137(6):690-692. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0571. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30973602 Free PMC article.
-
Triage Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps: 5-Year Follow-up Evaluation.J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 10;24(5):e31810. doi: 10.2196/31810. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35536633 Free PMC article.
-
Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e027743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31375610 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review.NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 17;5(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00667-w. NPJ Digit Med. 2022. PMID: 35977992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Utilization patterns and efficiency gains from use of a fully EHR-integrated COVID-19 self-triage and self-scheduling tool: a retrospective analysis.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2066-2074. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac161. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36029243 Free PMC article.
-
Health Information Seeking From an Intelligent Web-Based Symptom Checker: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 19;24(8):e36322. doi: 10.2196/36322. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35984690 Free PMC article.
-
The Utility of a Pediatric COVID-19 Online Forward Triage Tool in Switzerland.Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;10:902072. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902072. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35874988 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of a Decision Support System in Back Pain Diagnoses: A Pilot Study.Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 25;2019:1314028. doi: 10.1155/2019/1314028. eCollection 2019. Biomed Res Int. 2019. PMID: 31019964 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Monitoring telehealth vomiting calls as a potential public health early warning system for seasonal norovirus activity in Ontario, Canada.Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e112. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818003357. Epidemiol Infect. 2019. PMID: 30869009 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gann B. Giving patients choice and control: health informatics on the patient journey. Yearb Med Inform 2012;7:70-3. - PubMed
-
- Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Internet and American life project. Pew Research Center and California Health Care Foundation, 2013:4.
-
- North F, Ward WJ, Varkey P, et al. Should you search the Internet for information about your acute symptom? Telemed J E Health 2012;18:213-8. - PubMed
-
- Black P. The dangers of using Google as a diagnostic aid. Br J Nurs 2009;18:1157. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources