Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
- PMID: 26157077
- PMCID: PMC4496786
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3480
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic and triage accuracy of online symptom checkers (tools that use computer algorithms to help patients with self diagnosis or self triage).
Design: Audit study.
Setting: Publicly available, free symptom checkers.
Participants: 23 symptom checkers that were in English and provided advice across a range of conditions. 45 standardized patient vignettes were compiled and equally divided into three categories of triage urgency: emergent care required (for example, pulmonary embolism), non-emergent care reasonable (for example, otitis media), and self care reasonable (for example, viral upper respiratory tract infection).
Main outcome measures: For symptom checkers that provided a diagnosis, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker listed the correct diagnosis first or within the first 20 potential diagnoses (n=770 standardized patient evaluations). For symptom checkers that provided a triage recommendation, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker correctly recommended emergent care, non-emergent care, or self care (n=532 standardized patient evaluations).
Results: The 23 symptom checkers provided the correct diagnosis first in 34% (95% confidence interval 31% to 37%) of standardized patient evaluations, listed the correct diagnosis within the top 20 diagnoses given in 58% (55% to 62%) of standardized patient evaluations, and provided the appropriate triage advice in 57% (52% to 61%) of standardized patient evaluations. Triage performance varied by urgency of condition, with appropriate triage advice provided in 80% (95% confidence interval 75% to 86%) of emergent cases, 55% (47% to 63%) of non-emergent cases, and 33% (26% to 40%) of self care cases (P<0.001). Performance on appropriate triage advice across the 23 individual symptom checkers ranged from 33% (95% confidence interval 19% to 48%) to 78% (64% to 91%) of standardized patient evaluations.
Conclusions: Symptom checkers had deficits in both triage and diagnosis. Triage advice from symptom checkers is generally risk averse, encouraging users to seek care for conditions where self care is reasonable.
© Semigran et al 2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Comment in
-
Fifty million people use computerised self triage.BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3727. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26156750 No abstract available.
References
-
- Gann B. Giving patients choice and control: health informatics on the patient journey. Yearb Med Inform 2012;7:70-3. - PubMed
-
- Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Internet and American life project. Pew Research Center and California Health Care Foundation, 2013:4.
-
- North F, Ward WJ, Varkey P, et al. Should you search the Internet for information about your acute symptom? Telemed J E Health 2012;18:213-8. - PubMed
-
- Black P. The dangers of using Google as a diagnostic aid. Br J Nurs 2009;18:1157. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources