Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08.

Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction

Paris D Butler  1 , Liza C Wu  1
Affiliations
Review

Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction

Paris D Butler et al. Gland Surg. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Abdominally based free flaps have become the mainstay for women that desire to use their own tissue as a means of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. As the techniques have evolved, significant effort has been invested in finding the best means of minimizing morbidity to the abdominal donor site while ensuring a viable reconstructed breast that is aesthetically pleasing. This manuscript reviews and compares the muscle sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MsfTRAM), the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP), and the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps, regarding flap success rate, operative times, abdominal donor site morbidity and residual functionality, hospital lengths of stay and associated costs, impact of co-morbid conditions, and resilience after adjuvant radiation treatment.

Keywords: Muscle sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MsfTRAM) flap; deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap; free flap breast reconstruction; superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA). Available online: http://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-and-Initiatives/Other-Insurance-Protec...
    1. Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;13:423-7. - PubMed
    1. Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:737-46; discussion 747-50. - PubMed
    1. Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:216-25. - PubMed
    1. Hartrampf CR, Jr. The transverse abdominal island flap for breast reconstruction. A 7-year experience. Clin Plast Surg 1988;15:703-16. - PubMed