Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun 25:3:92.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00092. eCollection 2015.

Detection of Genomic Structural Variants from Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Affiliations
Review

Detection of Genomic Structural Variants from Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Lorenzo Tattini et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Structural variants are genomic rearrangements larger than 50 bp accounting for around 1% of the variation among human genomes. They impact on phenotypic diversity and play a role in various diseases including neurological/neurocognitive disorders and cancer development and progression. Dissecting structural variants from next-generation sequencing data presents several challenges and a number of approaches have been proposed in the literature. In this mini review, we describe and summarize the latest tools - and their underlying algorithms - designed for the analysis of whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, custom captures, and amplicon sequencing data, pointing out the major advantages/drawbacks. We also report a summary of the most recent applications of third-generation sequencing platforms. This assessment provides a guided indication - with particular emphasis on human genetics and copy number variants - for researchers involved in the investigation of these genomic events.

Keywords: amplicon sequencing; copy number variants; next generation sequencing; statistical methods; structural variants; whole-exome sequencing; whole-genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Signatures and patterns of SVs for deletion (A), novel sequence insertion (B), inversion (C), and tandem duplication (D) in read count (RC), read-pair (RP), split-read (SR), and de novo assembly (AS) methods.

References

    1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium Abecasis G. R., Altshuler D., Auton A., Brooks L. D., Durbin R. M., et al. (2010). A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073.10.1038/nature09534 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abyzov A., Urban A. E., Snyder M., Gerstein M. (2011). Cnvnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical cnvs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 21, 974–984.10.1101/gr.114876.110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkan C., Coe B. P., Eichler E. E. (2011a). Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 363–376.10.1038/nrg2958 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkan C., Sajjadian S., Eichler E. E. (2011b). Limitations of next-generation genome sequence assembly. Nat. Methods 8, 61–65.10.1038/nmeth.1527 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkan C., Kidd J. M., Marques-Bonet T., Aksay G., Antonacci F., Hormozdiari F., et al. (2009). Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Genet. 41, 1061–1067.10.1038/ng.437 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources