Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015:2015:681653.
doi: 10.1155/2015/681653. Epub 2015 May 28.

Molecular Profiling-Selected Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Pancreaticobiliary Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Molecular Profiling-Selected Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Pancreaticobiliary Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Ron Epelbaum et al. Biomed Res Int. 2015.

Abstract

This multicenter cohort study assessed the impact of molecular profiling (MP) on advanced pancreaticobiliary cancer (PBC). The study included 30 patients treated with MP-guided therapy after failing ≥ 1 therapy for advanced PBC. Treatment was considered as having benefit for the patient if the ratio between the longest progression-free survival (PFS) on MP-guided therapy and the PFS on the last therapy before MP was ≥ 1.3. The null hypothesis was that ≤ 15% of patients gain such benefit. Overall, ≥ 1 actionable (i.e., predictive of response to specific therapies) biomarker was identified/patient. Immunohistochemistry (the most commonly used method for guiding treatment decisions) identified 1-6 (median: 4) actionable biomarkers per patient. After MP, patients received 1-4 (median: 1) regimens/patient (most commonly, FOLFIRI/XELIRI). In a decision-impact analysis, of the 27 patients for whom treatment decisions before MP were available, 74.1% experienced a treatment decision change in the first line after MP. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for clinical outcome analysis; in 37.5%, the PFS ratio was ≥ 1.3. In one-sided exact binomial test versus the null hypothesis, P = 0.0015; therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. In conclusion, our analysis demonstrated the feasibility, clinical decision impact, and potential clinical benefits of MP-guided therapy in advanced PBC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison between the longest PFS on MP-guided therapy (dark grey) and PFS on last regimen on which patients progressed before MP (light grey) in 9 patients for whom this ratio was ≥1.3.

References

    1. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2014;64(1):9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghosn M., Kourie H. R., El Karak F., Hanna C., Antoun J., Nasr D. Optimum chemotherapy in the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;20(9):2352–2357. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Version 1.2013. 2013. https://www.nccn.org/store/login/login.aspx?ReturnURL=http://www.nccn.or.... - PubMed
    1. Herrmann R., Bodoky G., Ruhstaller T., et al. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(16):2212–2217. doi: 10.1200/jco.2006.09.0886. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altwegg R., Ychou M., Guillaumon V., et al. Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;18(12):1357–1364. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i12.1357. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances