Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jul;44(7):E211-5.

Comparison of Outcomes and Costs of Tension-Band and Locking-Plate Osteosynthesis in Transverse Olecranon Fractures: A Matched-Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 26161765
Comparative Study

Comparison of Outcomes and Costs of Tension-Band and Locking-Plate Osteosynthesis in Transverse Olecranon Fractures: A Matched-Cohort Study

Michael H Amini et al. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Jul.

Abstract

To determine if there are significant differences in outcomes and costs between tension-band and locking-plate fixation of transverse olecranon fractures in adults, we retrospectively compared functional outcomes, complications, and costs in 2 cohorts of displaced transverse olecranon fractures. These cohorts (10 patients each) were matched on age and length of follow-up. There were no significant differences between the groups in range of motion, functional scores, or arthrosis. There were no infections or nonunions in either group. There was no significant difference in rate of implant removal or symptomatic implants, though a trend was found toward a higher rate of both with tension bands. Operative time was significantly (P = .025) less for tension-band than locking-plate fixation (55 vs 85 minutes). In the tension-band group, charges were significantly less for implant, index procedure, and overall operative charges including reoperations ($6598.36 vs $14,333.46; P = .001). If all tension bands and no locking plates had been removed, tension-band fixation still would have cost significantly less ($7307.31 vs $14,160.26; P = .0005).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources