Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov;35(8):999-1006.
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv087. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

Combining abdominal and cosmetic breast surgery does not increase short-term complication rates: a comparison of each individual procedure and pretreatment risk stratification tool

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Combining abdominal and cosmetic breast surgery does not increase short-term complication rates: a comparison of each individual procedure and pretreatment risk stratification tool

Nima Khavanin et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Combined abdominal and breast surgery presents a convenient and relatively cost-effective approach for accomplishing both procedures.

Objectives: This study is the largest to date assessing the safety of combined procedures, and it aims to develop a simple pretreatment risk stratification method for patients who desire a combined procedure.

Methods: All women undergoing abdominoplasty, panniculectomy, augmentation mammaplasty, and/or mastopexy in the TOPS database were identified. Demographics and outcomes for combined procedures were compared to individual procedures using χ(2) and Student's t-tests. Multiple logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios for the effect of a combined procedure on 30-day complications. Among combined procedures, a logistic regression model determined point values for pretreatment risk factors including diabetes (1 point), age over 53 (1), obesity (2), and 3+ ASA status (3), creating a 7-point pretreatment risk stratification tool.

Results: A total of 58,756 cases met inclusion criteria. Complication rates among combined procedures (9.40%) were greater than those of aesthetic breast surgery (2.66%; P < .001) but did not significantly differ from abdominal procedures (9.75%; P = .530). Nearly 77% of combined cases were classified as low-risk (0 points total) with a 9.78% complication rates. Medium-risk patients (1 to 3 points) had a 16.63% complication rate, and high-risk (4 to 7 points) 38.46%.

Conclusions: Combining abdominal and breast procedures is safe in the majority of patients and does not increase 30-day complications rates. The risk stratification tool can continue to ensure favorable outcomes for patients who may desire a combined surgery.

Level of evidence: 4 Risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Complication rates among low, medium, and high-risk patients undergoing combined breast and abdominal procedures. The complication rates are 9.78%, 16.63%, and 38.46% for low, medium, and high-risk procedures, respectively. The overall complication rate for combined procedures is 9.91%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank: Statistics 2013. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(1 suppl):1S-22S. - PubMed
    1. Dillerud E. Abdominoplasty combined with suction lipoplasty: a study of complications, revisions, and risk factors in 487 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;255:333-338; discussion 339-343. - PubMed
    1. Hester TR, Jr., Baird W, Bostwick J, 3rd, Nahai F, Cukic J. Abdominoplasty combined with other major surgical procedures: safe or sorry? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;836:997-1004. - PubMed
    1. Savage RC. Abdominoplasty combined with other surgical procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;704:437-443. - PubMed
    1. Stevens WG, Cohen R, Vath SD, Stoker DA, Hirsch EM. Does lipoplasty really add morbidity to abdominoplasty? Revisiting the controversy with a series of 406 cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2005;254:353-358. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms