Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul 11:15:637.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1958-0.

Assessment of the Chinese Resident Health Literacy Scale in a population-based sample in South China

Minxue Shen  1   2 , Ming Hu  3 , Siyun Liu  4 , Yan Chang  5 , Zhenqiu Sun  6
Affiliations

Assessment of the Chinese Resident Health Literacy Scale in a population-based sample in South China

Minxue Shen et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: A national health literacy scale was developed in China in 2012, though no studies have validated it. In this investigation, we assessed the reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance of that scale.

Methods: A population-based sample of 3731 participants in Hunan Province was used to validate the Chinese Resident Health Literacy Scale based on item response theory and classical test theory (including split-half coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and confirmatory factor analysis). Measurement invariance was examined by differential item functioning.

Results: The overall Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.95 and Spearman-Brown coefficient 0.94. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the test measured a unidimensional construct with three highly correlated factors. Highest discrimination was found among participants with limited to moderate health literacy. In all, 64 items were selected from the original scale based on factor loading, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and discrimination and difficulty parameters in item response theory. Measurement invariance was significant but slight. According to the two-level linear model, health literacy was associated with education level, occupation, and income.

Conclusions: The 2012 national health literacy scale was validated, and 64 items were selected based on classical test theory and item response theory. The revised version of the scale has strong psychometric properties with minor measurement invariance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study sampling process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Test information and participant ability. Ability signifies health literacy estimated using the maximum-likelihood method. Ability in the item response theory (IRT) model practically (though not exclusively) ranged from −3 to +3. The test information reached a peak when the ability was between −1 and 0; this indicates that the measurement exhibited highest discriminative power among participants with limited and under-average ability with respect to health literacy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Chinese Ministry of Health . 66 tips of health: Chinese resident health literacy manual. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2008.
    1. Li XH. Brief introduction on identification and dissemination of the Basic Knowledge and Skill of People’s Health Literacy by Chinese government. Chinese J Health Educ. 2008;24(5):385–388.
    1. World Health Organization . Health promotion glossary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004. - PubMed
    1. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):2072–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types