Real options analysis for land use management: Methods, application, and implications for policy
- PMID: 26164637
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.004
Real options analysis for land use management: Methods, application, and implications for policy
Abstract
Discounted cash flow analysis, including net present value is an established way to value land use and management investments which accounts for the time-value of money. However, it provides a static view and assumes passive commitment to an investment strategy when real world land use and management investment decisions are characterised by uncertainty, irreversibility, change, and adaptation. Real options analysis has been proposed as a better valuation method under uncertainty and where the opportunity exists to delay investment decisions, pending more information. We briefly review the use of discounted cash flow methods in land use and management and discuss their benefits and limitations. We then provide an overview of real options analysis, describe the main analytical methods, and summarize its application to land use investment decisions. Real options analysis is largely underutilized in evaluating land use decisions, despite uncertainty in policy and economic drivers, the irreversibility and sunk costs involved. New simulation methods offer the potential for overcoming current technical challenges to implementation as demonstrated with a real options simulation model used to evaluate an agricultural land use decision in South Australia. We conclude that considering option values in future policy design will provide a more realistic assessment of landholder investment decision making and provide insights for improved policy performance.
Keywords: Agriculture; Economic; Land use; Planning; Real options.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Climate change and the economics of biomass energy feedstocks in semi-arid agricultural landscapes: A spatially explicit real options analysis.J Environ Manage. 2017 May 1;192:171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.049. Epub 2017 Feb 2. J Environ Manage. 2017. PMID: 28160645
-
Identifying the spatial and temporal variability of economic opportunity costs to promote the adoption of alternative land uses in grain growing agricultural areas: an Australian example.J Environ Manage. 2015 May 15;155:123-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 30. J Environ Manage. 2015. PMID: 25836353
-
Uncertainty analysis of remediation cost and damaged land value for brownfield investment.Chemosphere. 2019 Apr;220:371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.116. Epub 2018 Dec 18. Chemosphere. 2019. PMID: 30590303
-
Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector.Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3270-90. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12591. Epub 2014 May 8. Glob Chang Biol. 2014. PMID: 24700759 Review.
-
Application of real options in carbon capture and storage literature: Valuation techniques and research hotspots.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148683. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148683. Epub 2021 Jun 26. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 34246146 Review.
Cited by
-
Investing in climate change adaptation and mitigation: A methodological review of real-options studies.Ambio. 2021 Jan;50(1):229-241. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01342-8. Epub 2020 May 25. Ambio. 2021. PMID: 32451968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability.Nature. 2017 Apr 12;544(7649):217-222. doi: 10.1038/nature21694. Nature. 2017. PMID: 28406202
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources