Envisioning a Future Governance and Funding System for Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education
- PMID: 26164639
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000816
Envisioning a Future Governance and Funding System for Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education
Erratum in
- Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1560
Abstract
Funding for graduate medical education (GME) and undergraduate medical education (UME) in the United States is being debated and challenged at the national and state levels as policy makers and educators question whether the multibillion dollar investment in medical education is succeeding in meeting the nation's health care needs. To address these concerns, the authors propose a novel all-payer system for GME and UME funding that equitably distributes medical education costs among all stakeholders, including those who benefit most from medical education. Through a "Medical Education Workforce (MEW) trust fund," indirect and direct GME dollars would be replaced with a funds-flow mechanism using fees paid for services by all payers (Medicaid, Medicare, private insurers, others) while providing direct compensation to physicians and institutions that actively engage medical learners in providing clinical care. The accountability of those receiving MEW funds would be improved by linking their funding levels to their ability to meet predetermined institutional, program, faculty, and learner benchmarks. Additionally, the MEW fund would cover learners' UME tuition, potentially eliminating their UME debt, in return for their provision of health care services (after completing GME training) in an underserved area or specialty. This proposed model attempts to increase transparency and enhance accountability in medical education by linking funding to the development of a physician workforce that is able to excel in the evolving health delivery system. Achieving this vision requires physician educators, leaders of academic health centers, policy makers, insurers, and patients to muster the courage to embrace transformational change.
Similar articles
-
The impact of graduate medical education financing policies on pediatric residency training.Pediatrics. 1998 Apr;101(4 Pt 2):785-92; discussion 793-4. Pediatrics. 1998. PMID: 9544184
-
Medical education in a changing world: thoughts from California.Fam Med. 1998 Feb;30(2):127-33. Fam Med. 1998. PMID: 9494804
-
A Statewide Strategy for Expanding Graduate Medical Education by Establishing New Teaching Hospitals and Residency Programs.Acad Med. 2015 Sep;90(9):1264-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000803. Acad Med. 2015. PMID: 26312605
-
Medicare financing of graduate medical education.J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):283-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10804.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 11972725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Graduate medical education: the policy debate.Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:35-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.35. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11274509 Review.
Cited by
-
STRENGTHENING OUR VOICE IN PUBLIC POLICY ON MEDICAL EDUCATION.Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2019;130:156-165. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31516179 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Graduate medical education funding mechanisms, challenges, and solutions: A narrative review.Am J Surg. 2021 Jan;221(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Am J Surg. 2021. PMID: 32680622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Financing graduate medical education: challenges for training the next generation of electrophysiologists.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;56(2):143-150. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0406-3. Epub 2018 Aug 16. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30117010
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources