Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Sep-Oct;44(5):376-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

Physicians' perceptions of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score in older adults with acute myocardial infarction

Shelli L Feder  1 , Dena Schulman-Green  2 , Mary Geda  3 , Kathleen Williams  3 , John A Dodson  4 , Michael G Nanna  5 , Heather G Allore  3 , Terrence E Murphy  6 , Mary E Tinetti  7 , Thomas M Gill  6 , Sarwat I Chaudhry  8
Affiliations
Observational Study

Physicians' perceptions of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score in older adults with acute myocardial infarction

Shelli L Feder et al. Heart Lung. 2015 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate physician-perceived strengths and limitations of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores for use in older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Background: The TIMI risk scores are risk stratification models developed to estimate mortality risk for patients hospitalized for AMI. However, these models were developed and validated in cohorts underrepresenting older adults (≥75 years).

Methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews and the constant comparative method for analysis.

Results: Twenty-two physicians completed interviews ranging 10-30 min (mean = 18 min). Median sample age was 37 years, with a median of 11.5 years of clinical experience. TIMI strengths included familiarity, ease of use, and validation. Limitations included a lack of risk factors relevant to older adults and model scope and influence.

Conclusions: Physicians report that the TIMI models, while widely used in clinical practice, have limitations when applied to older adults. New risk models are needed to guide AMI treatment in this population.

Keywords: Aging; Myocardial infarction; Older adult; Risk factors; Risk stratification model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES

Conflict of interest: None

References

    1. Gharacholou SM, Lopes RD, Alexander KP, et al. Age and outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from the APEX-AMI trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):559–567. - PubMed
    1. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial Infarction: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: In collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circ. 2007;115(19):2570–2589. - PubMed
    1. Mehta RH, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: Differences by age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(3):736–741. - PubMed
    1. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139–e228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):e78–e140. - PubMed

Publication types