Maternal Consequences of the Detection of Fragile X Carriers in Newborn Screening
- PMID: 26169437
- PMCID: PMC4516945
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0414
Maternal Consequences of the Detection of Fragile X Carriers in Newborn Screening
Abstract
Objectives: The possibility of newborn screening for fragile X syndrome is complicated by the potential for identifying premutation carriers. Although knowing the child's carrier status has potential benefits, the possibility of late-onset disorders in carrier children and their parents raises concerns about whether such information would be distressing to parents and potentially more harmful than helpful. This study sought to answer this question by offering voluntary fragile X screening to new parents and returning results for both the full mutation and premutation FMR1 gene expansions. We tested the assumption that such information could lead to adverse mental health outcomes or decision regret. We also wanted to know if child age and spousal support were associated with the outcomes of interest.
Methods: Eighteen mothers of screen-positive infants with the premutation and 15 comparison mothers completed a battery of assessments of maternal anxiety, postpartum depression, stress, family quality of life, decision regret, and spousal support. The study was longitudinal, with an average of 3 assessments per mother.
Results: The premutation group was not statistically different from the comparison group on measures of anxiety, depression, stress, or quality of life. A subset of mothers experienced clinically significant anxiety and decision regret, but factors associated with these outcomes could not be identified. Greater spousal support was generally associated with more positive outcomes.
Conclusions: Although we did not find evidence of significant adverse events, disclosure of newborn carrier status remains an important consideration in newborn screening policy.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Similar articles
-
Maternal attitudes to newborn screening for fragile X syndrome.Am J Med Genet A. 2013 Feb;161A(2):301-11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35752. Epub 2013 Jan 9. Am J Med Genet A. 2013. PMID: 23303663
-
Differential sensitivity to life stress in FMR1 premutation carrier mothers of children with fragile X syndrome.Health Psychol. 2012 Sep;31(5):612-22. doi: 10.1037/a0026528. Epub 2011 Dec 12. Health Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22149120 Free PMC article.
-
Child and genetic variables associated with maternal adaptation to fragile X syndrome: a multidimensional analysis.Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Mar 15;146A(6):720-9. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32240. Am J Med Genet A. 2008. PMID: 18266246
-
An assessment of screening strategies for fragile X syndrome in the UK.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(7):1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta5070. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11262423 Review.
-
Newborn screening for fragile X syndrome.JAMA Neurol. 2014 Mar;71(3):355-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4808. JAMA Neurol. 2014. PMID: 24395328 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of optimism, religion, and hope on mood and anxiety disorders in women with the FMR1 premutation.J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Oct;61(10):916-927. doi: 10.1111/jir.12409. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017. PMID: 28895261 Free PMC article.
-
The acceptability of blood spot screening and genome sequencing in newborn screening: a systematic review examining evidence and frameworks.Health Technol Assess. 2025 Mar 12:1-53. doi: 10.3310/RTPQ2268. Online ahead of print. Health Technol Assess. 2025. PMID: 40085432 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Sep 27;8(4):53. doi: 10.3390/ijns8040053. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022. PMID: 36278623 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review.Med Decis Making. 2020 Nov;40(8):946-958. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20963038. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Med Decis Making. 2020. PMID: 33089748 Free PMC article.
-
Insight and Recommendations for Fragile X-Premutation-Associated Conditions from the Fifth International Conference on FMR1 Premutation.Cells. 2023 Sep 21;12(18):2330. doi: 10.3390/cells12182330. Cells. 2023. PMID: 37759552 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bailey DB, Skinner D, Hatton D, Roberts J. Family experiences and factors associated with the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000;21(5):315–321 - PubMed
-
- Bailey DB, Jr, Skinner D, Sparkman KL. Discovering fragile X syndrome: family experiences and perceptions. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):407–416 - PubMed
-
- Bailey DB, Jr, Raspa M, Bishop E, Holiday D. No change in the age of diagnosis for fragile X syndrome: findings from a national parent survey. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):527–533 - PubMed
-
- Kemper AR, Green NS, Calonge N, et al. . Decision-making process for conditions nominated to the recommended uniform screening panel: statement of the US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Genet Med. 2014;16(2):183–187 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical