Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug;12(8):435-44.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.159. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches

Affiliations
Review

Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches

Michael L Blute Jr et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

No guidelines currently exist that address the need for rebiopsy in patients with a negative diagnosis of prostate cancer on initial biopsy sample analysis. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer in these patients is often complicated by continued elevation of serum PSA levels that are suggestive of prostate cancer, resulting in a distinct management challenge. Following negative initial findings of biopsy sample analysis, total serum PSA levels and serum PSA kinetics are ineffective indicators of a need for a repeat biopsy; therefore, patients suspected of having prostate cancer might undergo several unnecessary biopsy procedures. Several alternative strategies exist for identifying men who might be at risk of prostate cancer despite negative findings of biopsy sample analysis. Use of other serum PSA-related measurements enables more sensitive and specific diagnosis and can be combined with knowledge of clinicopathological features to improve outcomes. Other options include the FDA-approved Progensa(®) test and prostate imaging using MRI. Newer tissue-based assays that measure methylation changes in normal prostate tissue are currently being developed. A cost-effective strategy is proposed in order to address this challenging clinical scenario, and potential directions of future studies in this area are also described.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):928-33 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2009 Feb 12;457(7231):910-4 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):1947-52 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(7):841-5 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1184-8; discussion 1188 - PubMed

Publication types