Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0130733.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130733. eCollection 2015.

A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache

Jeffrey L Jackson et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications.

Design: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models.

Data sources: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration.

Results: Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol.

Conclusion: Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline's superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA Flowchart of study selection.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Alpha blockers compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 3
Fig 3. ACE and ARBs compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Topiramate compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Valproate compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Dose response relationship of headache to topiramate dose.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Propranolol compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Flunarizine compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 9
Fig 9. SSRI/SNRIs compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 10
Fig 10. Pizotifen compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 11
Fig 11. TCAs compared to placebo for episodic migraine headaches.
Fig 12
Fig 12. Amitriptyline compared to placebo for migraine headaches.
Fig 13
Fig 13. Network meta-analysis
Fig 14
Fig 14. Placebo effect of treatment of episodic migraine headaches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rasmussen BK (2001) Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 21: 774–777. - PubMed
    1. Wang SJ (2003) Epidemiology of migraine and other types of headache in Asia. Current Neurology & Neuroscience Reports 3: 104–108. - PubMed
    1. Radtke A, Neuhauser H (2009) Prevalence and burden of headache and migraine in Germany. Headache 49: 79–89. HED1263 [pii]; 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01263.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karli N, Zarifoglu M, Ertafs M, Saip S, Ozturk V, Bicakci S, et al. (2006) Economic impact of primary headaches in Turkey: a university hospital based study: part II. J Headache Pain 7: 75–82. 10.1007/s10194-006-0273-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falavigna A, Teles AR, Velho MC, Vedana VM, Silva RC, Mazzocchin T, et al. (2010) Prevalence and impact of headache in undergraduate students in Southern Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 68: 873–877. S0004-282X2010000600008 [pii]. - PubMed

Publication types