Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Aug;63(8):1658-62.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13534. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making

Siobhan M Case et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine older persons' understanding of healthcare decision-making involving trade-offs.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Primary care clinics.

Participants: Community-living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).

Measurements: After being primed to think about trade-offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade-off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade-off.

Results: Forty-four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade-off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade-off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end-of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.

Conclusion: The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade-offs involved in healthcare decision-making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade-offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade-offs involved in day-to-day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high-stakes decisions including surgery and end-of-life care.

Keywords: chronic disease; decision-making; trade-offs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lorgunpai SJ, Grammas M, Lee DS, et al. Potential therapeutic competition in community-living older adults in the US: use of medications that may adversely affect a coexisting condition. PloS one. 2014;9:e89447. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee DH, Markwardt S, Goeres L, et al. Statins and physical activity in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried TR, O'Leary J, Towle V, et al. Health outcomes associated with polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 In press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried TR, Tinetti ME, Iannone L, et al. Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1854–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014. - PubMed

Publication types