Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;130(2):587-95.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1224-0. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

Renaissance of criticism on the concept of brain death--the role of legal medicine in the context of the interdisciplinary discussion

L Markert  1 , B Bockholdt  2 , M A Verhoff  3 , S Heinze  4   5 , M Parzeller  6
Affiliations

Renaissance of criticism on the concept of brain death--the role of legal medicine in the context of the interdisciplinary discussion

L Markert et al. Int J Legal Med. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: In the practice of legal medicine in Germany, the assessment of brain death is of minor importance and attracts little attention. However, since several years, international criticism on the concept of brain death has culminated. By reviewing literature and the results of a questionnaire distributed among the participants of the 93rd Annual Congress of the Germany Society of Legal Medicine, the state of knowledge and the current views on brain death were evaluated.

Materials and methods: Literature search of recent publications regarding brain death was performed (PubMed database, references of legal medicine, Report of the President's Council on Bioethics, USA 2008). A questionnaire was developed and distributed among the participants of the Congress.

Results: The assumption that individual and brain death are synonymous is criticized. Internationally, there are trends to harmonize the very different clinical criteria to assess brain death. The diagnostic advantage of novel techniques such as CT angiography is controversially discussed. It becomes apparent that procedures which record the blood flow and perfusion of the brain will be applied more in the future. Regrettably, these developments are not described in the literature of legal medicine. Moreover, among German forensic scientists, different views concerning brain death exist. The majority favors its equivalent treatment with individual death. The thanatological background can be improved concerning certain aspects of brain death as well as its legal implications.

Conclusion: Teaching and research in legal medicine should include the subject brain death. Expertise in forensic science may contribute to the interdisciplinary discussion on brain death. The transfer of actual knowledge, also on disputed ethical aspects of thanatology, to physicians of all disciplines is of great importance.

Keywords: Brain death; Law; Legal medicine; Thanatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Mar-Apr;28(2):14-23 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 2009 Feb 17;72(7):677; author reply 677-8 - PubMed
    1. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Dec;15(3):547-53 - PubMed
    1. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(3):376-82 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108 Suppl 1:i6-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources