Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Risk Factors for Untimely Access
- PMID: 26174998
- PMCID: PMC4799910
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12335
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Risk Factors for Untimely Access
Abstract
Objective: To determine how access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is distributed across demographics.
Data sources: Secondary data from the 2011 American Hospital Association (AHA) survey data combined with 2010 Census.
Study design: We calculated prehospital times from 32,370 ZIP codes to the nearest PCI center. We used a multivariate logit model to determine the odds of untimely access by the ZIP code's concentration of vulnerable populations.
Data collection: We used ZIP code-level data on community characteristics from the 2010 Census and supplemented it with 2011 AHA survey data on service-line availability of PCI for responding hospitals.
Principal findings: For approximately 306 million Americans, the median prehospital time to the nearest PCI center is 33 minutes. While 84 percent of Americans live within one hour of a PCI center, the odds of untimely access are higher in low-income (OR: 3.00; 95 percent CI: 2.39, 3.77), rural (8.10; 95 percent CI: 6.84, 9.59), and highly Hispanic communities (2.55; 95 percent CI: 1.86, 3.49).
Conclusions: While the majority of Americans live within 60 minutes of a PCI center, rural, low-income, and highly Hispanic communities have worse PCI access. This may translate into worse outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; disparities.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures
Note. Central lines represent the median prehospital times, and the encompassing boxes represent the interquartile range. The whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentiles.
References
-
- Abrams, T. E. , Vaughan‐Sarrazin M., and Kaboli P. J.. 2010. “Mortality and Revascularization Following Admission for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Implication for Rural Veterans.” Journal of Rural Health 26 (4): 310–7. doi:10.1111/j.1748‐0361.2010.00318.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alter, D. A. , Naylor C. D., Austin P., and Tu J. V.. 1999. “Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Access to Invasive Cardiac Procedures and on Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction.” New England Journal of Medicine 341 (18): 1359–67. doi:10.1056/nejm199910283411806. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Antman, E. M. , Anbe D. T., Armstrong P. W., Bates E. R., Green L. A., Hand M., Hochman J. S., Krumholz H. M., Kushner F. G., Lamas G. A., Mullany C. J., Ornato J. P., Pearle D. L., Sloan M. A., Smith S. C. Jr, and Jacobs A. K.. 2004. “ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction–Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction).” Circulation 110 (5): 588–636. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baker, L. C. , and Phibbs C. S.. 2002. “Managed Care, Technology Adoption, and Health Care: The Adoption of Neonatal Intensive Care.” RAND Journal of Economics 33 (3): 524–48. - PubMed
-
- Begley, C. E. , Westheimer Vojvodic R., Seo M., and Burau K.. 2006. “Emergency Room Use and Access to Primary Care: Evidence from Houston, Texas.” Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 17 (3): 610–24. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
