Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance for Bloodstream Infections for Sepsis Management in Low-Resource Settings
- PMID: 26175032
- PMCID: PMC4596611
- DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0083
Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance for Bloodstream Infections for Sepsis Management in Low-Resource Settings
Abstract
Bacterial sepsis is a leading cause of mortality among febrile patients in low- and middle-income countries, but blood culture services are not widely available. Consequently, empiric antimicrobial management of suspected bloodstream infection is based on generic guidelines that are rarely informed by local data on etiology and patterns of antimicrobial resistance. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surveillance for bloodstream infections to inform empiric management of suspected sepsis in low-resource areas, we compared costs and outcomes of generic antimicrobial management with management informed by local data on etiology and patterns of antimicrobial resistance. We applied a decision tree model to a hypothetical population of febrile patients presenting at the district hospital level in Africa. We found that the evidence-based regimen saved 534 more lives per 100,000 patients at an additional cost of $25.35 per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4,739. This ratio compares favorably to standard cost-effectiveness thresholds, but should ultimately be compared with other policy-relevant alternatives to determine whether routine surveillance for bloodstream infections is a cost-effective strategy in the African context.
© The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future.Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):612-624. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z. Epub 2017 Mar 27. Intensive Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28349179 Review.
-
Performance Requirements to Achieve Cost-Effectiveness of Point-of-Care Tests for Sepsis Among Patients with Febrile Illness in Low-Resource Settings.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Oct;93(4):841-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0082. Epub 2015 Jul 20. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015. PMID: 26195467 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters for preventing neonatal bloodstream infection: the PREVAIL RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(57):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta24570. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 33174528 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of severe sepsis.Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00001. Crit Care Med. 2003. PMID: 12544986 Clinical Trial.
-
Drotrecogin alfa (activated): a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in severe sepsis.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(7):445-76. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422070-00004. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15137883 Review.
Cited by
-
Costs-effectiveness and cost components of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions affecting antibiotic resistance outcomes in hospital patients: a systematic literature review.BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 29;9(2):e013205. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013205. BMJ Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 38423548 Free PMC article.
-
Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future.Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):612-624. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z. Epub 2017 Mar 27. Intensive Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28349179 Review.
-
The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock.Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;5(3):456-478. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5030032. Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39189251 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sepsis among Neonates in a Ghanaian Tertiary Military Hospital: Culture Results and Turnaround Times.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11659. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811659. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36141932 Free PMC article.
-
Direct testing by VITEK® 2: A dependable method to reduce turnaround time in Gram-negative bloodstream infections.J Lab Physicians. 2018 Jul-Sep;10(3):260-264. doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_11_18. J Lab Physicians. 2018. PMID: 30078959 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Deen J, von Seidlein L, Andersen F, Elle N, White NJ, Lubell Y. Community-acquired bacterial bloodstream infections in developing countries in south and southeast Asia: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:480–487. - PubMed
-
- Leibovici L, Shraga I, Drucker M, Konigsberger H, Samra Z, Pitlik SD. The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection. J Intern Med. 1998;244:379–386. - PubMed
-
- Petti CA, Polage CR, Quinn TC, Ronald AR, Sande MA. Laboratory medicine in Africa: a barrier to effective health care. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:377–382. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 TW009237/TW/FIC NIH HHS/United States
- BB/L018845/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/L017679/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/L018845/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/J010367/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical