Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;7(2):91-100.

Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring

Affiliations

Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring

R Hertz et al. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2015.

Abstract

This study explores the attitudes and experiences of 57 sperm donors who responded to a survey posted online in the United States and indicated that they had had contact with their donor-conceived offspring or the parents of their donor-conceived offspring. On average, 18 years had elapsed since the respondents donated sperm. In the interim between donating and having contact with offspring, most had become curious about their offspring. Most made contact through a bank or online registry. Most respondents had communicated with at least one offspring at least once and most had exchanged photos with offspring. Approximately two-thirds had met in person once; the same proportion had communicated over email or text. Other forms of communication were less common. Almost half of the respondents now considered their donor-conceived offspring to be like a family member. At the same time, donors are respectful of the integrity of the family in which their offspring were raised. Donors with contact are open to having their partners and children know their donor-conceived offspring. Although contact is generally positive, donors report that establishing boundaries and defining the relationship can be very difficult. Some donors also urge those who are thinking of donating to consider the consequences and some suggest avoiding anonymity. There were no significant differences in attitudes and experiences between those who donated anonymously and those who had been identity-release for their offspring when they turned 18.

Keywords: Anonymity; assisted reproduction; donor-conceived offspring; offspring; sperm donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allan S. A Cross-Jurisdictional Study of Regulatory Requirements and Practice Regarding the Recording of Donor Information and Its Release to Donor Conceived People. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012:2160–2627.
    1. Beeson DR, Jennings PK, Kramer W. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2415–2424. - PubMed
    1. Blyth E, Frith L. Donor-Conceived People’s Access to Genetic and Biographical History: An Analysis of Provisions in Different Jurisdictions Permitting Disclosure of Donor Identity. Int J Law Policy Fam. 2009;23:174–191.
    1. Blyth E, Landau R. Third Party Assisted Conception Across Cultures: Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2004.
    1. Broderick P, Walker I. Donor gametes and embryos: who wants to know what about whom, and why? Polit Life Sci. 2001;20:29–42. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources