Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring
- PMID: 26175887
- PMCID: PMC4498174
Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring
Abstract
This study explores the attitudes and experiences of 57 sperm donors who responded to a survey posted online in the United States and indicated that they had had contact with their donor-conceived offspring or the parents of their donor-conceived offspring. On average, 18 years had elapsed since the respondents donated sperm. In the interim between donating and having contact with offspring, most had become curious about their offspring. Most made contact through a bank or online registry. Most respondents had communicated with at least one offspring at least once and most had exchanged photos with offspring. Approximately two-thirds had met in person once; the same proportion had communicated over email or text. Other forms of communication were less common. Almost half of the respondents now considered their donor-conceived offspring to be like a family member. At the same time, donors are respectful of the integrity of the family in which their offspring were raised. Donors with contact are open to having their partners and children know their donor-conceived offspring. Although contact is generally positive, donors report that establishing boundaries and defining the relationship can be very difficult. Some donors also urge those who are thinking of donating to consider the consequences and some suggest avoiding anonymity. There were no significant differences in attitudes and experiences between those who donated anonymously and those who had been identity-release for their offspring when they turned 18.
Keywords: Anonymity; assisted reproduction; donor-conceived offspring; offspring; sperm donors.
Similar articles
-
Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders.J Law Biosci. 2015 Oct 29;3(1):39-67. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv045. eCollection 2016 Apr. J Law Biosci. 2015. PMID: 27774232 Free PMC article.
-
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor.Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Dec 23;2020(4):hoaa057. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa057. eCollection 2020. Hum Reprod Open. 2020. PMID: 33585704 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.Hum Reprod. 2019 Apr 1;34(4):672-678. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez009. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30805634
-
The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;20(3):265-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32830136ca. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18460941 Review.
-
Anonymous or known donors? A brief discussion of the psychosocial issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Mar;16(1):44-7. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.780664. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013. PMID: 23548093 Review.
Cited by
-
Experiences and attitudes of Danish men who were sperm donors more than 10 years ago; a qualitative interview study.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0281022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281022. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36791066 Free PMC article.
-
Applications to statutory donor registers in Victoria, Australia: information sought and expectations of contact.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Sep 4;9:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.002. eCollection 2019 Dec. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019. PMID: 31956702 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allan S. A Cross-Jurisdictional Study of Regulatory Requirements and Practice Regarding the Recording of Donor Information and Its Release to Donor Conceived People. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012:2160–2627.
-
- Beeson DR, Jennings PK, Kramer W. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2415–2424. - PubMed
-
- Blyth E, Frith L. Donor-Conceived People’s Access to Genetic and Biographical History: An Analysis of Provisions in Different Jurisdictions Permitting Disclosure of Donor Identity. Int J Law Policy Fam. 2009;23:174–191.
-
- Blyth E, Landau R. Third Party Assisted Conception Across Cultures: Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2004.
-
- Broderick P, Walker I. Donor gametes and embryos: who wants to know what about whom, and why? Polit Life Sci. 2001;20:29–42. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous