Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov 15;32(22):1693-721.
doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3306. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury

Affiliations
Review

A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury

Franck Amyot et al. J Neurotrauma. .

Abstract

The incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States was 3.5 million cases in 2009, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is a contributing factor in 30.5% of injury-related deaths among civilians. Additionally, since 2000, more than 260,000 service members were diagnosed with TBI, with the vast majority classified as mild or concussive (76%). The objective assessment of TBI via imaging is a critical research gap, both in the military and civilian communities. In 2011, the Department of Defense (DoD) prepared a congressional report summarizing the effectiveness of seven neuroimaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], transcranial Doppler [TCD], positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, electrophysiologic techniques [magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography], and functional near-infrared spectroscopy) to assess the spectrum of TBI from concussion to coma. For this report, neuroimaging experts identified the most relevant peer-reviewed publications and assessed the quality of the literature for each of these imaging technique in the clinical and research settings. Although CT, MRI, and TCD were determined to be the most useful modalities in the clinical setting, no single imaging modality proved sufficient for all patients due to the heterogeneity of TBI. All imaging modalities reviewed demonstrated the potential to emerge as part of future clinical care. This paper describes and updates the results of the DoD report and also expands on the use of angiography in patients with TBI.

Keywords: electrophysiology; imaging; spectroscopy; tomography; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Coronado V.G., McGuire L.C., Sarmiento K., Bell J., Lionbarger M.R., Jones C.D., Geller A.I., Khoury N., and Xu L. (2012). Trends in traumatic brain injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995–2009. J. Safety Res. 43, 299–307 - PubMed
    1. Faul M., Xu L., Wald M.M., and Coronado V.G. (2010). Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002–2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA
    1. Ommaya A.K., Ommaya A.K., Dannenberg A.L., and Salazar A.M. (1996). Causation, incidence, and costs of traumatic brain injury in the U.S. military medical system. J. Trauma 40, 211–217 - PubMed
    1. Heltemes K.J., Dougherty A.L., MacGregor A.J., and Galarneau M.R. (2011). Inpatient hospitalizations of U.S. military personnel medically evacuated from Iraq and Afghanistan with combat-related traumatic brain injury. Mil. Med. 176, 132–135 - PubMed
    1. MacGregor A.J., Dougherty A.L., and Galarneau M.R. (2011). Injury-specific correlates of combat-related traumatic brain injury in Operation Iraqi Freedom. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 26, 312–318 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms