Breast Cancer: Influence of Taxanes on Response Assessment with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
- PMID: 26176656
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150006
Breast Cancer: Influence of Taxanes on Response Assessment with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively investigate the influence of taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T-NACT) versus non-taxane-containing NACT (NT-NACT) on the contrast material enhancement of breast cancers, benign enhancing lesions (BELs), and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Materials and methods: This institutional review board-approved study was performed in 62 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent multiagent NACT with (n = 49) or without (n = 13) taxanes between 2008 and 2011. Written informed consent was obtained. Patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging according to a standardized protocol before and 2 weeks after completing NACT. The percentage reduction of enhancement of breast cancers, BELs, and BPEs was calculated for patients undergoing NT-NACT versus those undergoing T-NACT. Final surgical pathologic results served as standard of reference. Changes in mean enhancement of breast cancers, BELs, and BPEs between the regimens were compared by using the Student t test for unpaired samples; for intraindividual comparison, the Student t test for paired samples was used.
Results: Similar rates of complete pathologic response were observed after T-NACT and NT-NACT (28 [57.2%] of 49 vs eight [61.5%] of 13). T-NACT was associated with an almost complete suppression of enhancement in not only breast cancers but also BELs and BPE in the same patients, with an average reduction of enhancement of -89.9% ± 9.3, -90.2% ± 11.8, and -91.2% ± 7.5, respectively. After T-NACT, cancers with partial (n = 21) or complete (n = 28) pathologic response exhibited a similar reduction of enhancement (-81.8% ± 17.5 vs -93.9% ± 2.3; P = .22). The reduction of enhancement of cancers after NT-NACT was significantly less pronounced than that after T-NACT (-41.1% ± 22.8 vs 88.1% ± 13.9; P < .0001), and effects on enhancement of BELs and BPE were significantly less pronounced compared with effects on enhancement of cancers in the same women (P < .0001). MR imaging led to an overestimation of response (yielded false-negative results for residual disease) in 66.7% (14 of 21) of patients after T-NACT, versus in 20% (one of five) of patients after NT-NACT.
Conclusion: The reduction of enhancement observed in breast cancers after T-NACT is, in part, unrelated to their oncologic response. MR imaging-detectable effects of taxanes represent a combination of specific antimitotic and nonspecific antiangiogenic effects. This impacts the accuracy with which dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging helps predict complete pathologic response to T-NACT. (©) RSNA, 2015 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Similar articles
-
Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging--comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings.Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):357-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2542090405. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20093508
-
Effects of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors on breast tissue enhancement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: a longitudinal intraindividual cohort study.Radiology. 2014 Apr;271(1):45-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131198. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 24475835
-
Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience.Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):666-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050509. Epub 2006 Mar 20. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16549623
-
The Association of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Breast MRI with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Radiology. 2019 Sep;292(3):552-561. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182441. Epub 2019 Jun 25. Radiology. 2019. PMID: 31237494
-
Utilisation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging in predicting and monitoring of breast cancer response to chemotherapy.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jun;59(3):268-77. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12310. Epub 2015 Apr 24. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25913106 Review.
Cited by
-
Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response.Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1590-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4011-x. Epub 2015 Sep 17. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26382845
-
Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Benign Breast Lesions Compared to Cancers: Should an Additional Lesion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Responding Similar to Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy be Viewed with Suspicion?J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016 Sep 20;6:39. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.190899. eCollection 2016. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016. PMID: 27833781 Free PMC article.
-
Head‑to‑head comparison of contrast‑enhanced mammography and MRI in assessing the tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a prospective, multireader study.Radiol Med. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02068-x. Online ahead of print. Radiol Med. 2025. PMID: 40794243
-
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Oct;34(10):657-666. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0570-2. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Jpn J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27517370
-
Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review.Br J Radiol. 2017 Feb;90(1070):20160542. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160542. Epub 2016 Dec 7. Br J Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27925480 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials