Predictors of Postoperative Finger Stiffness in Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures
- PMID: 26180732
- PMCID: PMC4494501
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000396
Predictors of Postoperative Finger Stiffness in Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for postoperative finger stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable proximal phalangeal fractures using a low-profile plate and/or screw system. We hypothesized that dorsal plate placement is a risk factor for postoperative finger stiffness.
Methods: Seventy consecutive patients (50 men, 20 women; average age, 40 years) with 75 unstable proximal phalangeal fractures were treated with titanium plates and/or screws and evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Thirty-six comminuted fractures and 24 intra-articular fractures were included, and 16 fractures had associated soft-tissue injuries. Plate fixation was performed in 59 fractures, and the remaining 16 were fixed with screws only. The implants were placed in a dorsal location in 33 fractures and in a lateral or volar location in 42 fractures. Finger stiffness was defined as a total active range of finger motion <80% for the treated finger. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 8 variables: patient characteristics (age and sex), fracture characteristics (fracture comminution, joint involvement, and associated soft-tissue injury), and surgical characteristics (type and location of implants and removal of the implants).
Results: Postoperative finger stiffness occurred in 38 fractures. The multivariate analysis indicated that plate fixation (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-24.0; P = 0.01) and dorsal placement (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.3; P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for finger stiffness.
Conclusion: We recommend the use of screw fixation as much as possible for unstable proximal phalangeal fractures using a midlateral approach.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Pun WK, Chow SP, So YC, et al. A prospective study on 284 digital fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14:474–481. - PubMed
-
- Ouellette EA, Freeland AE. Use of the minicondylar plate in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;327:38–46. - PubMed
-
- Page SM, Stern PJ. Complications and range of motion following plate fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:827–832. - PubMed
-
- Bannasch H, Heermann AK, Iblher N, et al. Ten years stable internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal hand fractures—risk factor and outcome analysis show no increase of complications in the treatment of open compared with closed fractures. J Trauma. 2010;68:624–628. - PubMed
-
- Omokawa S, Fujitani R, Dohi Y, et al. Prospective outcomes of comminuted periarticular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated using a titanium plate system. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:857–863. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources