Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Jul;94(28):e1089.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001089.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students' Perspectives on the Engagement in Research

Cho Naing  1 , Victor Nyunt Wai, Jo Durham, Maxine A Whittaker, Ni Ni Win, Kyan Aung, Joon Wah Mak
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students' Perspectives on the Engagement in Research

Cho Naing et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Engaging students in active learning lies at the center of effective higher education. In medical schools, students' engagement in learning and research has come under increasing attention. The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on medical students' perspectives on the engagement in research. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant studies were searched in electronic databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Overall, 14 observational studies (with 17 data sets) were included. In general, many studies did not use the same questionnaires and the outcome measurements were not consistently reported; these presented some difficulties in pooling the results. Whenever data permitted, we performed pooled analysis for the 4 education outcomes. A Bayesian meta-analytical approach was supplemented as a measure of uncertainty. A pooled analysis showed that 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57%-11.07%; I2: 95.2%) of those students who engaged in research (while at the medical school) had positive attitudes toward their research experiences, whereas 49.5% (95% CI: 36.4%-62.7%; I2: 93.4%) had positive attitudes toward the study of medical sciences, 62.3% (95% CI: 46.7%-77.9%; I2: 96.3%) had self-reported changes in their practices, and 64% (95% CI: 30.8%-96.6%; I2: 98.5%) could have published their work. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies. We acknowledged the caveats and the merit of the current review. Findings showed that engagement in research resulted in favorable reactions toward research and academic learning. Future well-designed studies using standardized research tools on how to engage students in research are recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Forest plot showing positive responses in the learner's reaction.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot showing the learning outcome.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot showing the self-reported changes in practice.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Forest plot showing the publication output.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Coats H. Development of the Australian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). High Educ 2010; 60:1–17.
    1. Trowler V, Trowler P. Student engagement evidence summary. York, UK: Higher Education Academy; 2010.
    1. Kuh GD. What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change 2003; 35:24–32.
    1. Australian Council for Educational Research. 2008. National assessment program information communication and technology literacy, year 6 and year 10: technical report 2005. http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/2005_ICTL_Technical_Report.pdf (accessed September 12, 2014).
    1. Scott G. 2006. Accessing the student voice: using CE query to identify what retains students and promotes engagement in productive learning in Australian higher education. www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/.../HEIPCEQueryFinal_v2_1st_Feb_06.pdf (accessed September 12, 2014).

Publication types