Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;8(8):900-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

A 15-Year Warranty Period for Asymptomatic Individuals Without Coronary Artery Calcium: A Prospective Follow-Up of 9,715 Individuals

Affiliations

A 15-Year Warranty Period for Asymptomatic Individuals Without Coronary Artery Calcium: A Prospective Follow-Up of 9,715 Individuals

Valentina Valenti et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the long-term prognosis in asymptomatic individuals with a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 0 and its associated warranty period.

Background: Emerging evidence supports a CAC score of 0 as a favorable cardiovascular short-to intermediate-term prognostic factor.

Methods: A total of 9,715 individuals undergoing CAC imaging were stratified by age, Framingham risk score (FRS), and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) categories and followed for a mean of 14.6 years (range 12.9 to 16.8 years). Cox regression, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, and net reclassification information were used to assess all-cause mortality, discrimination, and reclassification of a CAC score of 0 compared with the FRS and NCEP ATP III, respectively. A warranty period was pre-defined as <1% annual mortality rate. Vascular age was estimated by linear regression.

Results: In 4,864 individuals with a baseline CAC score of 0 (mean age, 52.1 ± 10.8 years; 57.9% male), 229 deaths occurred. The warranty period of a CAC score of 0 was almost 15 years for individuals at low and intermediate risk with no significant differences regarding age and sex. A CAC score of 0 was associated with a vascular age of 1, 10, 20, and 30 years less than the chronological age of individuals between 50 and 59, 60 and 69, 70 and 79, and 80 years of age and older, respectively. The CAC score was the strongest predictor of death (hazard ratio: 2.67, 95% confidence interval: 2.29 to 3.11) that enabled discrimination and consistent reclassification beyond the FRS (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.71 vs. 0.64, p < 0.001) and NCEP ATP III (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.72 vs. 0.64, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: A CAC score of 0 confers a 15-year warranty period against mortality in individuals at low to intermediate risk that is unaffected by age or sex. Furthermore, in individuals considered at high risk by clinical risk scores, a CAC score of 0 confers better survival than in individuals at low to intermediate risk but with any CAC score.

Keywords: computed tomography; coronary artery calcium; mortality; prognosis; warranty period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. 15-year cumulative mortality rate for the study period
15-year cumulative mortality rate according to the overall study population and individuals considered low risk by Framingham Risk (blue line), National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (purple line), the absence of any CAD risk factor (yellow line), and CAC = 0 (green line).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hazard ratios for risk of all-cause mortality
Hazard ratios for risk of all-cause mortality among individuals with and without coronary artery calcification according to: (A) Framingham Risk Score, and (B) National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Annual mortality rate during the study period
An annual mortality rate below 1% was employed in order to classify individuals at low-risk of cardiovascular events.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Observed warranty period for absence of CAC compared with the presence of CAC
Observed warranty period (time to exceed 1% risk) for a CAC = 0 compared with the presence of any coronary artery calcium across 15 years of follow-up among 9715 asymptomatic individuals stratified by coronary artery calcium score, age, gender, Framingham risk score (FRS) and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Differences between chronologic and vascular age
(A) Differences between chronologic versus vascular age in patients with zero coronary artery calcium score and (B) the corresponding annual mortality rate.

Comment in

References

    1. Jain A, McClelland RL, Polak JF, et al. Cardiovascular imaging for assessing cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic men versus women: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging. 2011 Jan;4(1):8–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. LaMonte MJ, FitzGerald SJ, Church TS, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and coronary heart disease events in a large cohort of asymptomatic men and women. American journal of epidemiology. 2005 Sep 1;162(5):421–429. - PubMed
    1. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003 Sep;228(3):826–833. - PubMed
    1. Folsom AR, Kronmal RA, Detrano RC, et al. Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Archives of internal medicine. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1333–1339. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007 Jan 23;49(3):378–402. - PubMed

Publication types