Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S85-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.001.

Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review

Anna W Brittain et al. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Context: Family planning services are essential for reducing high rates of unintended pregnancies among young people, yet a perception that providers will not preserve confidentiality may deter youth from accessing these services. This systematic review, conducted in 2011, summarizes the evidence on the effect of assuring confidentiality in family planning services to young people on reproductive health outcomes. The review was used to inform national recommendations on providing quality family planning services.

Evidence acquisition: Multiple databases were searched to identify articles addressing confidentiality in family planning services to youth aged 10-24 years. Included studies were published from January 1985 through February 2011. Studies conducted outside the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand, and those that focused exclusively on HIV or sexually transmitted diseases, were excluded.

Evidence synthesis: The search strategy identified 19,332 articles, nine of which met the inclusion criteria. Four studies examined outcomes. Examined outcomes included use of clinical services and intention to use services. Of the four outcome studies, three found a positive association between assurance of confidentiality and at least one outcome of interest. Five studies provided information on youth perspectives and underscored the idea that young people greatly value confidentiality when receiving family planning services.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates that there is limited research examining whether confidentiality in family planning services to young people affects reproductive health outcomes. A robust research agenda is needed, given the importance young people place on confidentiality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytic framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram showing evolution of evidence bases.

References

    1. Brindis CD, Morreale MC, English A. The unique health care needs of adolescents. Future Child. 2003;13(1):117–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1602643. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sigman G, Silber TJ, English A, Epner JE. Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 1997;21(6):408–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(9700171-7). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng TL, Savageau JA, Sattler AL, DeWitt TG. Confidentiality in health care: a survey of knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes among high school students. JAMA. 1993;269(11):1404–1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500110072038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford CA, English A, Sigman G. Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35(2):160–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(04)00086-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford CA, Millstein SG, Halpern-Felsher BL, Irwin Influence of physician confidentiality assurances on adolescents’ willingness to disclose information and seek future health care. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(12):1029–1034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550120089044. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types