Task-dependent changes of corticospinal excitability during observation and motor imagery of balance tasks
- PMID: 26192097
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.031
Task-dependent changes of corticospinal excitability during observation and motor imagery of balance tasks
Abstract
Non-physical balance training has demonstrated to be efficient to improve postural control in young people. However, little is known about the potential to increase corticospinal excitability by mental simulation in lower leg muscles. Mental simulation of isolated, voluntary contractions of limb muscles increase corticospinal excitability but more automated tasks like walking seem to have no or only minor effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This may be related to the way of performing the mental simulation or the task itself. Therefore, the present study aimed to clarify how corticospinal excitability is modulated during AO+MI, MI and action observation (AO) of balance tasks. For this purpose, MEPs and H-reflexes were elicited during three different mental simulations (a) AO+MI, (b) MI and (c) passive AO. For each condition, two balance tasks were evaluated: (1) quiet upright stance (static) and (2) compensating a medio-lateral perturbation while standing on a free-swinging platform (dynamic). AO+MI resulted in the largest facilitation of MEPs followed by MI and passive AO. MEP facilitation was significantly larger in the dynamic perturbation than in the static standing task. Interestingly, passive observation resulted in hardly any facilitation independent of the task. H-reflex amplitudes were not modulated. The current results demonstrate that corticospinal excitability during mental simulation of balance tasks is influenced by both the type of mental simulation and the task difficulty. As H-reflexes and background EMG were not modulated, it may be argued that changes in excitability of the primary motor cortex were responsible for the MEP modulation. From a functional point of view, our findings suggest best training/rehabilitation effects when combining MI with AO during challenging postural tasks.
Keywords: action observation; balance tasks; motor imagery; postural control; transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution and motor imagery combined with virtual action observation.Neurosci Lett. 2021 Jun 11;755:135907. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135907. Epub 2021 Apr 19. Neurosci Lett. 2021. PMID: 33887382
-
Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Mar;237(3):637-645. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5454-5. Epub 2018 Dec 8. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 30536148
-
Brain activity during observation and motor imagery of different balance tasks: an fMRI study.Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.022. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Cortex. 2015. PMID: 25461711
-
The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability and movement outcomes: Two meta-analyses.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Dec;143:104911. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104911. Epub 2022 Nov 5. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022. PMID: 36349570 Review.
-
Moving forward: methodological considerations for assessing corticospinal excitability during rhythmic motor output in humans.J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul 1;126(1):181-194. doi: 10.1152/jn.00027.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 16. J Neurophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34133230 Review.
Cited by
-
Continual Learning of a Transformer-Based Deep Learning Classifier Using an Initial Model from Action Observation EEG Data to Online Motor Imagery Classification.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;10(2):186. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020186. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36829681 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of combined action observation and motor imagery of walking on lower limb reflex modulation in patients after stroke-preliminary results.BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 13;15(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06057-5. BMC Res Notes. 2022. PMID: 35562777 Free PMC article.
-
Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1489-1505. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06069-w. Epub 2021 Mar 8. Exp Brain Res. 2021. PMID: 33683403 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Can motor imagery balance the acute fatigue induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulation?Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 May;123(5):1003-1014. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-05129-5. Epub 2023 Jan 9. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36622447
-
Effects of action observation and motor imagery of walking on the corticospinal and spinal motoneuron excitability and motor imagery ability in healthy participants.PLoS One. 2022 Apr 18;17(4):e0266000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266000. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35436303 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials