Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0132334.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132334. eCollection 2015.

Maternal Caffeine Consumption during Pregnancy and Risk of Low Birth Weight: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Maternal Caffeine Consumption during Pregnancy and Risk of Low Birth Weight: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Jongeun Rhee et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have shown inconsistent conclusions about the effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on the risk of low birth weight (LBW). We performed a meta-analysis and linear-dose response analysis examining the association between caffeine consumption during pregnancy and risk of LBW. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant articles published up to March 2014. Eight cohort and four case-control studies met all inclusion criteria. Using a random-effects model of the twelve studies, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for the risk of LBW comparing the highest versus lowest level of caffeine intake during pregnancy was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.73). Linear dose-response analysis showed that every additional 100 mg of caffeine intake (1 cup of coffee or 2 cups of tea) per day during pregnancy was associated with a 3.0% increase in OR for LBW. There was a moderate level of overall heterogeneity with an I-squared value of 55% (95% CI: 13, 76%), and no evidence of publication bias based on Egger's test (P = 0.20) and the funnel plot. Thus, high caffeine intake during pregnancy is associated with a significant increase in the risk of LBW, and this risk appears to increase linearly as caffeine intake increases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Literature search results for publications related to caffeine consumption during pregnancy and risk of low birth weight.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot of meta-analysis by using random effects model for the effect of maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy on the risk of low birth weight (comparing highest versus lowest levels).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Forest plot of meta-analysis by using random effects model for the effect of maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy on the risk of low birth weight (comparing highest versus lowest levels) among cohort studies.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Forest plot of meta-analysis by using random effects model for the effect of maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy on the risk of low birth weight (comparing highest versus lowest levels) among case-control studies.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Linear dose-response analysis on the effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on low birth weight.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Funnel plot of meta-analysis on the effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on low birth weight.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JE G. Food and Drug Administration, news release No. P80-36. Washington, DC: FDA, September 4, 1980.
    1. Gynecologists ACoOa. Moderate Caffeine Consumption During Pregnancy. https://wwwacogorg/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committ.... 2010. - PubMed
    1. Knutti R, Rothweiler H, Schlatter C. Effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;21(2):121–6. Epub 1981/01/01. . - PubMed
    1. Soyka LF. Caffeine ingestion during pregnancy: in utero exposure and possible effects. Semin Perinatol. 1981;5(4):305–9. Epub 1981/10/01. . - PubMed
    1. Goldstein A, Warren R. Passage of caffeine into human gonadal and fetal tissue. Biochem Pharmacol. 1962;11:166–8. Epub 1962/02/01. . - PubMed

Publication types