Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul 21:15:78.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0070-7.

Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus

Stefan J Lang et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: Corneal cross-linking is widely used to treat keratoconus. However, to date, only limited data from randomized trials support its efficacy.

Methods: The efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking for halting progression of keratoconus were investigated in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo controlled, multicentre trial. Twenty-nine keratoconus patients were randomized in three trial centres. The mean age at inclusion was 28 years. Longitudinal changes in corneal refraction were assessed by linear regression. The best corrected visual acuity, surface defects and corneal inflammation were also assessed. These data were analysed with a multifactorial linear regression model.

Results: A total of 15 eyes were randomized to the treatment and 14 to the control group. Follow-up averaged 1098 days. Corneal refractive power decreased on average (+/-standard deviation) by 0.35 +/- 0.58 dioptres/year in the treatment group. The controls showed an increase of 0.11 +/- 0.61 dioptres/year. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that corneal cross-linking is an effective treatment for some patients to halt the progression of keratoconus. However, some of the treated patients still progressed, whereas some untreated controls improved. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to decide which patients require treatment and which do not.

Trial registration: NCT00626717, Date of registration: February 20, 2008.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort flow-chart. Three patients had an incomplete follow-up of one year. The data were included in the analysis. One patient belonged to the treatment arm, the other two to the placebo group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Corneal refractive power for each patient over the time of the follow-up

References

    1. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28:293–322. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90094-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tuft SJ, Hassan H, George S, Frazer DG, Willoughby CE, Liskova P. Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2012;90:e482–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02448.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugar J, Macsai MS. What causes keratoconus? Cornea. 2012;31:716–9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8c72. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro MB, France TD. The ocular features of Down’s syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:659–63. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76031-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bawazeer A, Hodge W, Lorimer B. Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:834–6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.8.834. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources