Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;167A(11):2635-46.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37256. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing

Affiliations

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing

Barbara A Bernhardt et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Despite the increased utilization of genome and exome sequencing, little is known about the actual content and process of informed consent for sequencing. We addressed this by interviewing 29 genetic counselors and research coordinators experienced in obtaining informed consent for sequencing in research and clinical settings. Interviews focused on the process and content of informed consent; patients/participants' common questions, concerns and misperceptions; and challenges to obtaining informed consent. Content analysis of transcribed interviews revealed that the main challenges to obtaining consent related to the broad scope and uncertainty of results, and patient/participants' unrealistic expectations about the likely number and utility of results. Interviewees modified their approach to sessions according to contextual issues surrounding the indication for testing, type of patient, and timing of testing. With experience, most interviewees structured sessions to place less emphasis on standard elements in the consent form and technological aspects of sequencing. They instead focused on addressing misperceptions and helping patients/participants develop realistic expectations about the types and implications of possible results, including secondary findings. These findings suggest that informed consent sessions should focus on key issues that may be misunderstood by patients/participants. Future research should address the extent to which various stakeholders agree on key elements of informed consent.

Keywords: genetic counseling; genetic testing; genomic sequencing; informed consent; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

References

    1. ACMG Board of Directors. Points to consider for informed consent for genome/exome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:748–749. - PubMed
    1. ACMG Board of Directors. ACMG policy statement: Updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genet Med. 2014;17:68–69. - PubMed
    1. Ayuso C, Millán JM, Mancheno M, Dal-Ré R. Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:1054–1059. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beskow LM, Friedman J, Hardy NC, Lin L, Weinfurt KP. Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: Stakeholder perspectives. Genet Med. 2010;12:567–572. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beskow LM, Dombeck CB, Thompson CP, Watson-Ormond JK, Weinfurt KP. Informed consent for biobanking: Consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension. Genet Med. 2014;17:226–233. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources