Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul 21;17(7):e178.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.4112.

Overcoming Clinical Inertia: A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Telehealth Remote Monitoring Intervention Using Paired Glucose Testing in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Deborah A Greenwood  1 , Shelley A Blozis, Heather M Young, Thomas S Nesbitt, Charlene C Quinn
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Overcoming Clinical Inertia: A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Telehealth Remote Monitoring Intervention Using Paired Glucose Testing in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Deborah A Greenwood et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a worldwide challenge. Practice guidelines promote structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for informing health care providers about glycemic control and providing patient feedback to increase knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior change. Paired glucose testing—pairs of glucose results obtained before and after a meal or physical activity—is a method of structured SMBG. However, frequent access to glucose data to interpret values and recommend actions is challenging. A complete feedback loop—data collection and interpretation combined with feedback to modify treatment—has been associated with improved outcomes, yet there remains limited integration of SMBG feedback in diabetes management. Incorporating telehealth remote monitoring and asynchronous electronic health record (EHR) feedback from certified diabetes educators (CDEs)—specialists in glucose pattern management—employ the complete feedback loop to improve outcomes.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a telehealth remote monitoring intervention using paired glucose testing and asynchronous data analysis in adults with type 2 diabetes. The primary aim was change in glycated hemoglobin (A(1c))—a measure of overall glucose management—between groups after 6 months. The secondary aims were change in self-reported Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), Diabetes Empowerment Scale, and Diabetes Knowledge Test.

Methods: A 2-group randomized clinical trial was conducted comparing usual care to telehealth remote monitoring with paired glucose testing and asynchronous virtual visits. Participants were aged 30-70 years, not using insulin with A1c levels between 7.5% and 10.9% (58-96 mmol/mol). The telehealth remote monitoring tablet computer transmitted glucose data and facilitated a complete feedback loop to educate participants, analyze actionable glucose data, and provide feedback. Data from paired glucose testing were analyzed asynchronously using computer-assisted pattern analysis and were shared with patients via the EHR weekly. CDEs called participants monthly to discuss paired glucose testing trends and treatment changes. Separate mixed-effects models were used to analyze data.

Results: Participants (N=90) were primarily white (64%, 56/87), mean age 58 (SD 11) years, mean body mass index 34.1 (SD 6.7) kg/m2, with diabetes for mean 8.2 (SD 5.4) years, and a mean A(1c) of 8.3% (SD 1.1; 67 mmol/mol). Both groups lowered A(1c) with an estimated average decrease of 0.70 percentage points in usual care group and 1.11 percentage points in the treatment group with a significant difference of 0.41 percentage points at 6 months (SE 0.08, t159=-2.87, P=.005). Change in medication (SE 0.21, t157=-3.37, P=.009) was significantly associated with lower A(1c) level. The treatment group significantly improved on the SDSCA subscales carbohydrate spacing (P=.04), monitoring glucose (P=.001), and foot care (P=.02).

Conclusions: An eHealth model incorporating a complete feedback loop with telehealth remote monitoring and paired glucose testing with asynchronous data analysis significantly improved A(1c) levels compared to usual care.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01715649; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01715649 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ZinLl8D0).

Keywords: blood glucose self-monitoring; diabetes mellitus, type 2; eHealth; electronic health records; health records, personal; hemoglobin A1c, glycosylated; monitoring, physiologic; patient participation; remote consultation; self-care; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: DAG received research support from the Investigator Initiated Studies program of LifeScan Corporation and Intel-GE Care Innovations. No other conflicts are declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Complete feedback loop for improved outcomes in diabetes management.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT flowchart of enrollment and participant status.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sample weekly paired glucose testing data analysis, by software designed for the study, and sample message text for feedback to participants through asynchronous secure messaging via the electronic health record.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimated A1C trajectories for the usual care and treatment groups from baseline to 6 months.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National Diabetes Statistics Report: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. [2015-07-03]. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014StatisticsReport.html .
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes-2015 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2015 Apr;33(2):97–111. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.33.2.97.97 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khunti Kamlesh, Wolden Michael L, Thorsted Brian Larsen, Andersen Marc, Davies Melanie J. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3411–7. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0331. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23877982 dc13-0331 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ziemer David C, Miller Christopher D, Rhee Mary K, Doyle Joyce P, Watkins Clyde, Cook Curtiss B, Gallina Daniel L, El-Kebbi Imad M, Barnes Catherine S, Dunbar Virginia G, Branch William T, Phillips Lawrence S. Clinical inertia contributes to poor diabetes control in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(4):564–71. doi: 10.1177/0145721705279050.31/4/564 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burke Sandra D, Sherr Dawn, Lipman Ruth D. Partnering with diabetes educators to improve patient outcomes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:45–53. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S40036. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S40036.dmso-7-045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data