Patient-Reported Sexual Function After Staged Penile Urethroplasty
- PMID: 26199158
- PMCID: PMC5595549
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.055
Patient-Reported Sexual Function After Staged Penile Urethroplasty
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate sexual function after staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal graft (OMG).
Methods: We identified men with completed staged penile urethroplasty with OMG from the Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons database between January 1, 2010 and May 1, 2014. Our primary outcome was change in total Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) and total Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Domain (MSHQ-EjD) Short Form at baseline vs after the second stage of the procedure. Second, we assessed subjective changes in penile curvature, length, and sensation.
Results: Thirty-three patients were included with a mean age of 45 years and mean body mass index of 27.6 kg/m(2). Urethral strictures arose from failed hypospadias repair in 52% and lichen sclerosus in 27%. Fifty-two percent of patients reported a previous urethroplasty. The median follow-up time between the second stage procedure and postoperative questionnaires was 6.3 months (interquartile range: 3.5-13.3). There was no significant change in the total SHIM (Δ0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.00∼1.72) and MSHQ-EjD (Δ1.55, 95% CI: -1.53∼4.63) scores preoperatively vs postoperatively. In addition, 32% reported improved and 52% no change in satisfaction with sexual intercourse (SHIM Q5). Forty percent of patients reported reduced and 45% no change in bother with ejaculation after surgery (MSHQ-EjD Q4). Men reported new penile curvature (23%), loss of penile length (55%), and altered penile sensitivity (45%) after surgery.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing staged penile urethroplasty with OMG are likely to have minimal changes in erectile and ejaculatory function postoperatively, although many may experience new penile curvature, reduced penile length, and/or reduced penile sensitivity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.Urology. 2015 Aug;86(2):400. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.060. Epub 2015 Jul 18. Urology. 2015. PMID: 26199156 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 26199156.Urology. 2015 Aug;86(2):400. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.061. Epub 2015 Jul 18. Urology. 2015. PMID: 26199157 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Dorsal Onlay Urethroplasty for Membranous Urethral Strictures: Urinary and Erectile Functional Outcomes.J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1501-1507. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.028. Epub 2015 Nov 19. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26602890
-
Staged Urethroplasty for Penile Urethral Strictures From Lichen Sclerosus and Failed Hypospadias Repair.Urology. 2018 Feb;112:222-224. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Urology. 2018. PMID: 29107132
-
One-Sided Dorsal Onlay Urethroplasty With Penile Invagination (Kulkarni Urethroplasty) for Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Single-Center Experience.Int J Urol. 2025 Jun;32(6):749-755. doi: 10.1111/iju.70048. Epub 2025 Mar 20. Int J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40110952
-
A critical outcome analysis of Asopa single-stage dorsal inlay substitution urethroplasty for penile urethral stricture.World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1283-1294. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02871-y. Epub 2019 Jul 18. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31321508 Review.
-
Anterior urethroplasty and effects on sexual life: which is the best technique?Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2010 Dec;62(4):371-6. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2010. PMID: 20944538 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of urethral transection on erectile function after anterior urethroplasty.World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):839-845. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1926-z. Epub 2016 Aug 25. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27562579
-
The Role of Multi-Staged Urethroplasty in Lichen Sclerosus Penile Urethral Strictures.J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 25;11(23):6961. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236961. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36498536 Free PMC article.
-
Re: Evaluation of erectile function after anastomotic vs substitution urethroplasty for bulbar stricture. Omar RG et al., Arab J Urol2020 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:10.1080/2090598x.2020.1805965.Arab J Urol. 2020 Oct 28;18(4):233-234. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1832402. Arab J Urol. 2020. PMID: 33425392 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Exploring the intersection of functional recurrence, patient-reported sexual function, and treatment satisfaction after anterior buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty.World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3533-3539. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03648-y. Epub 2021 Mar 11. World J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33709201 Free PMC article.
-
Update on managing anterior urethral strictures.Indian J Urol. 2019 Apr-Jun;35(2):94-100. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_52_19. Indian J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31000913 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Andrich DE, MacDonald JT, Nicol DL, Mundy AR. Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. The Journal of urology. 2004;172(1):275–7. - PubMed
-
- Rourke KF, Jordan GH. Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture. The Journal of urology. 2005;173(4):1206–10. - PubMed
-
- Wright JL, Wessells H, Nathens AB, Hollingworth W. What is the most cost-effective treatment for 1 to 2-cm bulbar urethral strictures: societal approach using decision analysis. Urology. 2006;67(5):889–93. - PubMed
-
- Heyns CF, Steenkamp JW, De Kock ML, Whitaker P. Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful? The Journal of urology. 1998;160(2):356–8. - PubMed
-
- Chapple C, Andrich D, Atala A, Barbagli G, Cavalcanti A, Kulkarni S, et al. SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: The management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty. Urology. 2014;83(3 Suppl):S31–47. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources