Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct;41(10):1363-81.
doi: 10.1177/0146167215594592. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

Social Stigma and Sexual Minorities' Romantic Relationship Functioning: A Meta-Analytic Review

David Matthew Doyle  1 , Lisa Molix  2
Affiliations
Review

Social Stigma and Sexual Minorities' Romantic Relationship Functioning: A Meta-Analytic Review

David Matthew Doyle et al. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

To bolster knowledge of determinants of relationship functioning among sexual minorities, the current meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively review evidence for the association between social stigma and relationship functioning as well as examine potential moderators. Thirty-five studies were identified, including 130 effect sizes (39 independent; N = 10,745). Across studies, evidence was found for a small but significant inverse association between social stigma and relationship functioning. Furthermore, this association was moderated by stigma type (with more deleterious associations for internalized relative to perceived stigma) and dimension of relationship functioning (with more deleterious associations for affective relative to cognitive and negative relative to positive). Evidence for demographic moderators (region, sex, race, age) was generally mixed although important limitations related to unique characteristics of study samples are discussed. We conclude by highlighting the importance of social stigma for relationship functioning and point toward directions for future research and policy action.

Keywords: internalized homophobia; perceived discrimination; romantic relationships; sexual minorities; social stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart depicting process of study identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Funnel plot displaying effect sizes (Fisher’s Z) by precision (inverse standard error). Note. The relatively symmetrical and funnel-shaped distribution presented in this figure indicates a low likelihood of significant publication bias in the current review. Egger’s test of the intercept as well as Duval’s trim and fill procedure statistically confirm the symmetry of this plot.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andersson G, Noack T, Seierstad A, Weedon-Fekjær H. The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography. 2006;43:79–98. - PubMed
    1. Balsam KF, Szymanski DM. Relationship quality and domestic violence in women’s same-sex relationships: The role of minority stress. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2005;29:258–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00220.x. - DOI
    1. Barth J, Overby LM. Are gay men and lesbians in the South the new “threat”? Regional comparisons of the contact theory. Politics & Policy. 2003;31:452–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00157.x. - DOI
    1. Boita J. Doctoral dissertation. 2006. Dual earner couples: Predicting relationship satisfaction among women with female partners. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3343660)
    1. Bolger N, DeLongis A, Kessler RC, Wethington E. The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1989;51:175–183. doi: 10.2307/352378. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources