Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:696038.
doi: 10.1155/2015/696038. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

Inventory of a Neurological Intensive Care Unit: Who Is Treated and How Long?

Affiliations

Inventory of a Neurological Intensive Care Unit: Who Is Treated and How Long?

Roland Backhaus et al. Neurol Res Int. 2015.

Abstract

Purpose. To characterize indications, treatment, and length of stay in a stand-alone neurological intensive care unit with focus on comparison between ventilated and nonventilated patient. Methods. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of all treated patients in our neurological intensive care unit between October 2006 and December 2008. Results. Overall, 512 patients were treated in the surveyed period, of which 493 could be included in the analysis. Of these, 40.8% had invasive mechanical ventilation and 59.2% had not. Indications in both groups were predominantly cerebrovascular diseases. Length of stay was 16.5 days in mean for ventilated and 3.6 days for nonventilated patient. Conclusion. Most patients, ventilated or not, suffer from vascular diseases with further impairment of other organ systems or systemic complications. Data reflects close relationship and overlap of treatment on nICU with a standardized stroke unit treatment and suggests, regarding increasing therapeutic options, the high impact of acute high-level treatment to reduce consequential complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Indications for treatment on nICU.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Length of stay (LOS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic procedures/patient.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Complications/patients.

References

    1. Deuschl G., Müllges W. Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologische Intensiv-und Notfallmedizin (DGNI) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN) zur Neurologischen Intensivmedizin. Aktuelle Neurologie. 2007;34:545–546.
    1. Suarez J. I., Zaidat O. O., Suri M. F., et al. Length of stay and mortality in neurocritically ill patients: impact of a specialized neurocritical care team. Critical Care Medicine. 2004;32(11):2311–2317. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000146132.29042.4c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Varelas P. N., Eastwood D., Yun H. J., et al. Impact of a neurointensivist on outcomes in patients with head trauma treated in a neurosciences intensive care unit. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006;104(5):713–719. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.5.713. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shan L., Zhang R., Li L.-D. Effect of timing of tracheotomy on clinical outcomes: an update meta-analysis including 11 trials. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal. 2013;28(3):159–166. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(13)60042-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broessner G., Helbok R., Lackner P., et al. Survival and long-term functional outcome in 1,155 consecutive neurocritical care patients. Critical Care Medicine. 2007;35(9):2025–2030. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000281449.07719.2b. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources