Biomaterials in the Reconstruction of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region
- PMID: 26201280
- DOI: 10.1159/000381700
Biomaterials in the Reconstruction of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region
Abstract
Reconstruction of maxillofacial bones has proven to be complex due to the aesthetic requirements and functional demands of the jaw. Although autogenous bone grafts and a wide range of biomaterials are routinely used for facial bone reconstruction, these methods are associated with a number of drawbacks, including the limited availability of autogenous grafts and the morbidity associated with bone graft harvesting, whilst biomaterials are also linked with a high failure rate. These limitations have inspired the search for innovative techniques for bone bioengineering and the development of more reliable biomaterials. Tissue engineering approaches yield powerful tools for long-term satisfying results enabling customized reconstruction and the support of natural healing processes. There is no doubt that further advances in tissue engineering are essential to achieve reliable and satisfactory clinical outcomes for patients. This chapter will highlight the clinical application of biomaterials and provide an overview of the current scientific concepts in the field.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Biomaterials and biologics in craniofacial reconstruction.J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jan;23(1):239-42. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241c0f4. J Craniofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22337417 Review.
-
Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Oct;63(10):1615-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jul 3. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010. PMID: 19577527 Review.
-
Biomaterials for craniofacial bone engineering.J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1187-95. doi: 10.1177/0022034514547271. Epub 2014 Aug 19. J Dent Res. 2014. PMID: 25139365 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomaterials in craniofacial surgery: experimental studies and clinical application.J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jan;20(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318190dd9e. J Craniofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19164984
-
Biomaterials in the face: benefits and risks.J Craniofac Surg. 1999 Sep;10(5):404-14. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199909000-00006. J Craniofac Surg. 1999. PMID: 10726511 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of a Three-Dimensional Porous Uncalcined and Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/poly-d/l-lactide Composite as a Regenerative Biomaterial in Maxillofacial Surgery.Materials (Basel). 2018 Oct 20;11(10):2047. doi: 10.3390/ma11102047. Materials (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30347816 Free PMC article.
-
Porous Polyethylene Coated with Functionalized Hydroxyapatite Particles as a Bone Reconstruction Material.Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 29;11(4):521. doi: 10.3390/ma11040521. Materials (Basel). 2018. PMID: 29596358 Free PMC article.
-
Osteocytes Influence on Bone Matrix Integrity Affects Biomechanical Competence at Bone-Implant Interface of Bioactive-Coated Titanium Implants in Rat Tibiae.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 29;23(1):374. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010374. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 35008800 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of the Sintering Process on Nacre-Derived Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Engineering.Molecules. 2020 Jul 8;25(14):3129. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143129. Molecules. 2020. PMID: 32650572 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical