Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;30(4):1534-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4369-5. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Effectiveness of Surgicel® (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Surgicel® (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Yu Sik Myung et al. Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background and aims: Because the invasive procedure of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) entails a extensive mucosal defect and submucosal exposure, the procedure may have a substantial risk of complications including delayed bleeding, perforation and bacteremia and/or endotoxemia. The aim of our study was to investigate whether Surgicel(®) would be effective in reducing complications after colorectal ESD.

Patients and methods: Between 2012 and 2013, 52 consecutive patients who underwent a colorectal ESD were enrolled. After the removal of colorectal epithelial neoplasm, surgicel was sprayed onto the submucosal surface using the wet type of application (Surgicel(®) group). We evaluated tumor type, location, size, histology, procedure time, hospital stay and associated complication. For assessing inflammatory reaction, white blood cells and body temperature were monitored. In assessing the effectiveness of Surgicel(®) application, we retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes with 52 other consecutive large colorectal tumor patients who had previously received conventional ESD, as control group (non-Surgicel(®) group).

Results: Of the 52 patients, three patients were excluded. Forty-nine patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. During the follow-up period, rebleeding occurred in 0 (0% in Surgicel(®) group) patients and 4 (7.7% in non-Surgicel(®) group) patients; fever (>37.7) in 2 (4.1%) and 10 (19.2%) patients, respectively (p = 0.019); and leukocytosis in 9 (18.4%) and 16 (30.8%) patients, respectively (p = 0.172). C-reactive protein level was 0.35 ± 0.18 and 9.83 ± 2.44 (p < 0.001). The mean hospitalization period was 4.22 ± 0.94 and 5.13 ± 0.27 days, respectively (p < 0.001). The group (surgicel vs. non-surgicel, p = 0.005, odds ratio 11.114 (2.104-58.718)) was identified as independent predictor for complication such as fever or delayed bleeding by multivariated analysis.

Conclusions: Surgicel(®) application after colorectal ESD may be an effective method to reduce some complications and mean hospitalization period. Therefore, surgicel application may be considered to be a valuable clinical method.

Keywords: Colorectal ESD; Complication; Surgicel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):663-7 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2009 Aug;41(8):679-83 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-52 - PubMed
    1. Oncol Rep. 2013 Jul;30(1):85-90 - PubMed
    1. Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:73-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources