Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;44(11):1609-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2214-5. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla

Affiliations
Free article

Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla

Lorenzo Nardo et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Nov.
Free article

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: This work aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a metal artifact suppression sequence (MAVRIC-SL) for imaging of hip arthroplasties (HA) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T) field strength.

Methods: Eighteen patients (10 females; aged 27-74) with HA were examined at 3.0 and 1.5 T within 3 weeks. The sequence protocol included 3D-MAVRIC-SL PD (coronal), 3D-MAVRIC-SL STIR (axial), FSE T1, FSE PD and STIR sequences. Anatomical structures and pathological findings were assessed independently by two radiologists. Artifact extent and technical quality (image quality, fat saturation and geometric distortion) were also evaluated. Findings at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: While image quality was better at 1.5 T, visualization of anatomic structures and clinical abnormalities was not significantly different using the two field strengths (p > 0.05). Fat suppression and amount of artifacts were significantly better at 1.5 T (p < 0.01). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for different anatomic details, image quality and visualization of abnormalities ranged from k = 0.62 to k = 1.00.

Conclusion: MAVRIC-SL at 1.5 T had a comparable diagnostic performance when compared MAVRIC-SL at 3.0 T; however, the higher field strength was associated with larger artifacts, limited image quality and worse fat saturation.

Keywords: Hip; MRI; Pain; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):2403-11 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jan;65(1):71-82 - PubMed
    1. HSS J. 2013 Oct;9(3):247-56 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):W60-4 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Sep;22(3):433-7 - PubMed

Publication types