Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016;11(4):321-8.
doi: 10.2174/1574888x10666150723150059.

iPS cell transplantation for traumatic spinal cord injury

Affiliations
Review

iPS cell transplantation for traumatic spinal cord injury

Miguel Goulão et al. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016.

Abstract

A large body of work has been published on transplantation of a wide range of neural stem and progenitor cell types derived from the developing and adult CNS, as well as from pluripotent embryonic stem cells, in models of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). However, many of these cell-based approaches present practical issues for clinical translation such as ethical cell derivation, generation of potentially large numbers of homogenously prepared cells, and immune rejection. With the advent of induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) cell technology, many of these issues may potentially be overcome. To date, a number of studies have demonstrated integration, differentiation into mature CNS lineages, migration and long-term safety of iPS cell transplants in a variety of SCI models, as well as therapeutic benefits in some cases. Given the clinical potential of this advance in stem cell biology, we present a concise review of studies published to date involving iPS cell transplantation in animal models of SCI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh A, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S. Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clinical …. 2014:309–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Center NSCIS. 2013 Annual Statistical Report for the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems- Complete Public Version. Birmingham, Alabama: 2013.
    1. Bracken MB, Holford TR. Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III. Journal of neurosurgery. 2002;96:259–66. - PubMed
    1. Fehlings MG, Perrin RG. The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: update with a review of recent clinical evidence. Injury. 2005;36(Suppl 2):B13–26. - PubMed
    1. Ogawa Y, Sawamoto K, Miyata T, Miyao S, Watanabe M, Nakamura M, et al. Transplantation of in vitro-expanded fetal neural progenitor cells results in neurogenesis and functional recovery after spinal cord contusion injury in adult rats. Journal of neuroscience research. 2002;69:925–33. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms